IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-11.txt

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Fri, 13 February 2015 05:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ietf.org@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE591A0024 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 21:42:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2b0eMy-VZys4 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 21:42:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95DDE1A19FA for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 21:40:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YM8vk-0007Jz-84 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 05:36:44 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 05:36:44 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YM8vk-0007Jz-84@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1YM8vb-0007Io-QR for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 05:36:35 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1YM8va-00075g-Kq for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 05:36:35 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.29] (unknown [59.167.195.195]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D67E922E1F4; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:36:08 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAH_y2NE5Yi+XixocVmGJmYjqFxSXdAhnnbLu=UaniWvzUjcnqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:36:04 +1100
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E3C118F6-8F44-4FA7-9618-AAC52654A84A@mnot.net>
References: <20150210142226.30946.77014.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJLfPAqhmx4gQe5C6zfkwZZarxNi66N_My_FKfwaToCJvA@mail.gmail.com> <54DA2B4B.6010000@greenbytes.de> <54DA48E0.30106@crf.canon.fr> <CABkgnnX7yaQFFWzAvdiP5KWYs7VOwwqPDq8yx1L8tbj3L5VeBA@mail.gmail.com> <54DB0894.9090007@gmx.de> <CAH_y2NE5Yi+XixocVmGJmYjqFxSXdAhnnbLu=UaniWvzUjcnqw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.749, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1YM8va-00075g-Kq 77d80d7d55b7a3826e56ba9d9c9bb548
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-11.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/E3C118F6-8F44-4FA7-9618-AAC52654A84A@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/28828
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Greg,

> On 13 Feb 2015, at 12:06 pm, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote:
> 
> On 11 February 2015 at 18:45, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> The best fix of course would be to fix the list. I don't understand why that is so hard.
> 
> Wow,  I really think the IETF needs to consider their process if simple stupid things like this can be detected by the process and still not fixed.
> 
> I thought we had just deferred the fixing of the table until a breaking binary change - and surely updating from h2-14 to h2-17 and then eventually to h2 is a binary breaking change that would have allowed us to fix the table?

Those aren't breaking changes -- i.e., they don't change the format.

> 
> So it is a distinct possibility that we will carry these errors in this table for decades.   Somebody should calculate the carbon emissions we are going to be responsible for because we didn't go for the small efficiency gains on offer with an optimised table!
> 
> I know I say this a lot, but EPIC FAIL!  

Yes...


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.40.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status