IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: signatures vs sf-date

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Tue, 24 January 2023 00:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ADE1C1524D6 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:04:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.747
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.747 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b="F6LN1Q2C"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="quXsdYVS"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4iB_chtiakfP for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:04:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E62AC15A74D for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:04:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1pK6kx-006YJP-Uc for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 00:01:43 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 00:01:43 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1pK6kx-006YJP-Uc@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1pK6kw-006YIH-5F for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 00:01:42 +0000
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1pK6kr-004JSQ-Tz for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 00:01:41 +0000
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7545C01DB; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 19:01:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 23 Jan 2023 19:01:29 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1674518489; x= 1674604889; bh=jmddysOigOKDXBEaycSIX2HDtxEhXFsN1lWhGa52xFU=; b=F 6LN1Q2CrD+pk0HtrZHZDbLU1jr5vGOadXKiDQUyZoVtlH9KCOxpDb82PfnpXxVn1 0DvEv3mWiVF/NuOh8P9BMG2SDdn+lLF7RnOpmsoQtn5Db4IchVtgwk9UlstsYJQ8 xaD0b7hj33VAzhquBaon/Niwus1sAtWuMfui4RR1QqLNDVrr5UlVOKwFYkvLHN7L MJbre1ddBhNMDCzOrNEvDrAd28vNarHDoVcBsF3oJjXu8hmXf0aID2XmJle4wjB+ BPWxSdrQ0XyAGJkUPdprtp5/EM3C53bjtKCrLqu3tVpQQ26liGC1XTWR5l7w63bZ 4PllBkgojio3IuS0pFV4A==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1674518489; x= 1674604889; bh=jmddysOigOKDXBEaycSIX2HDtxEhXFsN1lWhGa52xFU=; b=q uXsdYVSwRajgHPJxcd1D4f/zHPjmvITZZwJUDf6zpdIBNFrov2V0mQTnfM4tB1hi oEy7yv+SB2GgV81pWVbyaruu8yxV38Dbb7pKXrIWqLskUfvuSKK5xETIp+vCXDsA XtpGRATVKRSaOHYZvNRIYT3sfnMm/1mbHqwxHDh//8wAlISykguwXmv5k5Hrdnn8 60yE62N0TBvMIaaXLeO+Y3ww1cJdv86zOuWXEe6BUFxlgSne01Pls+cOGcKEwxtp WU0DrH/RMYa4SNZcXS78zIlqY+FoZTWAlfNhvpgBCVl/RF/8/vGPiO0gYb/6FYlU MqJTLJjDEe0OJAfAHpODg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:2B_PYwLqxZIW6fpJEpbRjiq70yUUdvr0V6NQJJ1SKeRYvEYSCd7ACg> <xme:2B_PYwKLUAwes_-q3v4EWatsSsspYHbV8vCHamR_OjEXvE8LaxDFQyeB57_6Hkq3V lstALx4cmTORxxjQQ>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:2B_PYwtUZ3QvwgW7ULPkGNXWSp_UfPRgm99-XOIatz7K6F3heHCDXpdZRxOVsspeYA817cmDQHrBlkJDPbNV9G5Bu-dfMcg08PJ5MduuTYYnsVIIs2UZED46>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudduledgudejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffvefgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeforghr khcupfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnheptddtgefgueevtddugfdtkeffudegveetffegjeelhfdvtedvueejteegueeg teetnecuffhomhgrihhnpehmnhhothdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtne curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:2B_PY9YWiK65VDHfsrrYf0jiU4KBw1dGv7zUzVWGVTCmzYqbMGkwgg> <xmx:2B_PY3bBAXJLHD-pCB3k11BLllqh-VmY0cbEKxiEgWmcH_PF0KGJSw> <xmx:2B_PY5D_PUzCE2DXYY5unrWxDmwRZ4uz18TJmKWAY2GnqaL6NUl1dA> <xmx:2R_PY-zm_ldEmNQxtUG9iCzpnMJcQH3A4MPBwvhoDrCHZl0d4olyiw>
Feedback-ID: ie6694242:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 19:01:27 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.300.101.1.3\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <4e63a31d-1168-2736-53f1-13b80a03dd05@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 11:01:04 +1100
Cc: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <262F3422-22EC-4AA6-803C-B45CEA8DAE87@mnot.net>
References: <2070c8e0-98d6-7b63-77c3-550bcd661397@gmx.de> <8b547e17-1f24-ff1f-90d1-ec4c974de88f@gmx.de> <FEA9B22C-B3AC-48D0-B4AC-64BADB8E8F18@mnot.net> <a4cae48c-960f-0edb-33c5-19e01b7e4093@gmx.de> <CALGR9oZMYhB8MXZzJHjb1QM+x7f3w_bENDLDqr39+BR5=t5r3w@mail.gmail.com> <4e63a31d-1168-2736-53f1-13b80a03dd05@gmx.de>
To: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.300.101.1.3)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.26; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=out2-smtp.messagingengine.com
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=mnot@mnot.net domain=mnot.net), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=mnot@mnot.net domain=messagingengine.com), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1pK6kr-004JSQ-Tz 07593aed6554691cb8b0a84ea291ece5
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: signatures vs sf-date
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/262F3422-22EC-4AA6-803C-B45CEA8DAE87@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/40704
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> On 24 Jan 2023, at 3:09 am, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> What about a dictionary, where you're only looking for "x" (expected to
> be an integer), but the sender adds an extension parameter "y" as sf-date?
> 
> A conforming parser (of the current spec) will reject the whole field
> value, and the recipient will not be able to see the value for "x".

If you are parsing a field that uses Date, its specification will refer to sf-bis, not RFC8941. Therefore, you will need to use an implementation that claims conformance to sf-bis. What's the problem?


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status