Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028A821F8F20 for ; Sun, 19 May 2013 20:31:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -9.441 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.441 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.158, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HkZn0UeUNmdb for ; Sun, 19 May 2013 20:31:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B92321F8F3E for ; Sun, 19 May 2013 20:31:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UeGnv-0006Zg-Bq for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 03:30:31 +0000 Resent-Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 03:30:31 +0000 Resent-Message-Id: Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UeGnh-0006Dg-1s for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 03:30:17 +0000 Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UeGng-0004tA-CD for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 03:30:17 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.80] (unknown [118.209.105.214]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7D4E22E253 for ; Sun, 19 May 2013 23:29:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Mark Nottingham Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 13:29:50 +1000 To: HTTP Working Group Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.389, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UeGng-0004tA-CD 093bccdb0b12cadcf88024a7902f3af1 X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org Subject: adding Header Continuation Archived-At: Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/18035 X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org Precedence: list List-Id: List-Help: List-Post: List-Unsubscribe: Roberto submitted a pull request for header continuation: https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/pull/98 Without going into the fine details of the text, are we ready to have = such a thing? My reading is that people are OK with this, at least to the point of = putting it in the implementation draft (i.e., implementation experience = may cause us to pull it back out again). Speak up if you disagree. Regards, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/