Re: Early Hints (103)

Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com> Thu, 24 November 2016 01:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21918129659 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 17:53:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C7YQyUdnrTHw for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 17:53:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77DF5129651 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 17:53:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1c9jAM-0006Om-AE for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 01:49:34 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 01:49:34 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1c9jAM-0006Om-AE@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <kazuhooku@gmail.com>) id 1c9jAG-0006NW-1q for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 01:49:28 +0000
Received: from mail-wj0-f177.google.com ([209.85.210.177]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <kazuhooku@gmail.com>) id 1c9jA9-00046p-RH for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 01:49:22 +0000
Received: by mail-wj0-f177.google.com with SMTP id v7so21724661wjy.2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 17:49:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ykAr070xXkOaHjShCYsH9wPuzU03fzI6xZJvz2Rvu8s=; b=a1N2wKm2mzJb6CyMFxriHuJgskIz2bQOSVyclsZHZ4n/lOmM/tWcX0ahymNn1Wl71D Ce2eTqoBQ2Lnqg8IsFLXTxH0iGk9L09tWQJjMQwjsJKpOJCxUyg4NHMuGZhuJXmRQ/Np J6tbTlFa9iKC0Gu7p/+CUspOPWSETI4ynS1t9lUVZ4P9WeyKFnpmqHuD6/D/RrM/OPx2 wouFOadvtlpe66Syejhu3lGXoIvDaw3umTgfYgxCXGZtBRmncbRuaNAD73eben+VU9Ud aYAVi2uQvoP9s3Mb7dHPGAHSJ9aKIXlR8KeWYW4APy9aogXfz6j24NYFuUIJu5gFOMtQ 7UQw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ykAr070xXkOaHjShCYsH9wPuzU03fzI6xZJvz2Rvu8s=; b=IWkAbZPlpY58F0JbXdjIiyJgOmLWoOJ4AjPeLGTSnaKMV3flwQEtThXn1NT7qy6iGB RAyiKqYKU1klt3sAOqqXwzQTAAZNA+1SD/VUE+Bu1Z1n3zKQ7c6Wiw0J6peMkFmhEEXL gJLU0/xpTGXjld6Ty3OxH9lFbwXBQ86Q+BV4YMEcx/rPu0lBDHDOOe3N6464ZafmRK03 lF7yii3ATLIot2AFYR8IdQ4W2cmj+cMIX6sQUR6p95KiCkG5/U0oMDvqph0gGZoq6xEw /ps834KDJQiaExmyig3xysVrRyM+hUp5tVB7RjVZ8mjbCp+5GP9sw46+cXHkrji3zP68 8PFQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC033Ybto7DbTX65Vg5Lz0w/iJLW6QVgBSCS6GXhqkLGTIn0slvzSlBFaIDEZYoGEzkrSfKY4L483XbLXGw==
X-Received: by 10.194.172.100 with SMTP id bb4mr5388060wjc.53.1479952135225; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 17:48:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.32.1 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 17:48:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAOdDvNos+qXxi8K3HPtkuzkAuc1ctAmdt=Oz+vJy+oBgB7skQA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOdDvNos+qXxi8K3HPtkuzkAuc1ctAmdt=Oz+vJy+oBgB7skQA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 10:48:54 +0900
Message-ID: <CANatvzzxk6bTuhn-=Y+=c_=7GpXJnas96LTPb68Xd-YqeG2g4Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013c6b2a4e09b20542023594
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.210.177; envelope-from=kazuhooku@gmail.com; helo=mail-wj0-f177.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.158, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1c9jA9-00046p-RH fe54674647c846e4ceac90de081c8778
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Early Hints (103)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CANatvzzxk6bTuhn-=Y+=c_=7GpXJnas96LTPb68Xd-YqeG2g4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32983
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Thank you Patrick,

2016-11-23 7:26 GMT+09:00 Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>om>:

> Dear Gentlefolk of HTTPbis,
>
> This is a followup to Kazuho's presentation in Seoul[*] where he discussed
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code/
>
> The idea seemed to have acceptance (both in the room and on the list) with
> some concerns expressed about interoperability. Kazuho was kind enough to
> publish an endpoint so you can test if the client you implement has an
> unexpected failure in the face of 103.
>
>
FWIW the endpoint was created by Tatsuhiko (the owner of nghttp2).

Regarding myself, we plan to add experimental support for sending 103
downstream to H2O, much the same way as mod_http2.


> However, the draft was published pretty close to meeting time and there
> wasn't much space for discussion in the room. So before we do a Call For
> Adoption, I would like to hear some more discussion so the chairs can be
> confident there is interest - even if that discussion is "I would like to
> implement that" or "what does that accomplish?". Please do chime in, your
> silence will be taken for disinterest otherwise :).
>
> -Patrick
>
> [*] http://recs.conf.meetecho.com/Playout/watch.jsp?recording=
> IETF97_HTTPBIS&chapter=chapter_1 goto 1:43 mark
>



-- 
Kazuho Oku