Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> Thu, 01 December 2016 15:25 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB0E129565
for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 1 Dec 2016 07:25:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.796
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.796 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896,
SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id u86FnKNRPdzo
for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 1 Dec 2016 07:25:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BA61129562
for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>;
Thu, 1 Dec 2016 07:25:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>)
id 1cCTB9-0002qK-9A
for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 15:21:43 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 15:21:43 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cCTB9-0002qK-9A@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79])
by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128)
(Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>)
id 1cCTAx-0002oc-UW
for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 15:21:31 +0000
Received: from www.ducksong.com ([192.155.95.102] helo=linode64.ducksong.com)
by mimas.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
(envelope-from <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>) id 1cCTAr-0004Dt-8P
for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 15:21:26 +0000
Received: from mail-qt0-f178.google.com (mail-qt0-f178.google.com
[209.85.216.178])
by linode64.ducksong.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C1CB3A045
for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 10:21:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail-qt0-f178.google.com with SMTP id w33so222998748qtc.3
for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 07:21:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01nbZsV/E+Qs0ap7G1VxV6MBqEujSBcgtZ6R54ZDnJA6VflF2mw9M2tGQLM9GFUkZPod3scsis5gpo4eA==
X-Received: by 10.200.55.61 with SMTP id o58mr34029942qtb.6.1480605660835;
Thu, 01 Dec 2016 07:21:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.147.78 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 07:21:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnV885jZzrZ6Q07V70fFy0Hxw5DbEJcmVX2gqDpPFkk5-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20161130043354.C786DB81319@rfc-editor.org>
<1102C272-E8D6-40D3-9D39-7D4801ABD286@lukasa.co.uk>
<CABkgnnXYTi0uv=Dm7zPrA=oPam+Zyka-jujFT2bU8GvqvT5JPg@mail.gmail.com>
<03C57CE4-E61A-4BF6-A976-2191EB4B127C@lukasa.co.uk>
<CANatvzzQZ_isxmd3Ne41QxE2s-sYsrksME+T0RtchM-K1b0DwA@mail.gmail.com>
<24141783-A04A-42AD-9730-EB5C91A36516@lukasa.co.uk>
<CABkgnnXXLUfC9q5YSQjRWZOqyPevkVrPT2VKvUAEK7caxQDDng@mail.gmail.com>
<CANatvzwGSLLENx6kXdBe6RUTP7XghhM5=H6ezXzeMehkeYye5A@mail.gmail.com>
<CABkgnnV885jZzrZ6Q07V70fFy0Hxw5DbEJcmVX2gqDpPFkk5-Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 10:21:00 -0500
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAOdDvNqw98X5ttGFVE-HkwL30bRj2XEnv9WxZ8N5y3HeAzzyxA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNqw98X5ttGFVE-HkwL30bRj2XEnv9WxZ8N5y3HeAzzyxA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>, Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>,
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>,
Roberto Peon <fenix@google.com>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>,
Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>,
Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>,
Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>,
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11463c6e77b02d05429a5eb9
Received-SPF: softfail client-ip=192.155.95.102;
envelope-from=pmcmanus@mozilla.com; helo=linode64.ducksong.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.367, BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1cCTAr-0004Dt-8P 617dcc68b6254fefdf31d70d19ea83fd
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAOdDvNqw98X5ttGFVE-HkwL30bRj2XEnv9WxZ8N5y3HeAzzyxA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33066
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 4:33 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, Patrick decided that he would use weights to fix that. In your > example, all the HTML would be dependent on an empty node that has > weight 1, which would be adjacent to the JS/CSS. In theory the HTML > does get some share. > and I have to say that in general I have a preference for "some small share" systems rather than strict ordering. It tends to turn priority inversion problems from deadlocks into performance corner cases. Much safer. > I think that much more complexity and we might as well just upload > javascript for the server to run. > :) - that's the kind of thinking that gave us PAC.
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871) Cory Benfield
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871) Martin Thomson
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871) Benedikt Christoph Wolters
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871) Amos Jeffries
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871) Cory Benfield
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871) Cory Benfield
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871) Cory Benfield
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871) Kazuho Oku
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871) Cory Benfield
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871) Kazuho Oku
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871) Benedikt Christoph Wolters
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871) Cory Benfield
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871) Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871) Stefan Eissing
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871) Ryan Hamilton
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871) laike9m
- RE: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871) Mike Bishop
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871) Martin Thomson
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871) Kazuho Oku
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871) Martin Thomson
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871) Patrick McManus
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871) Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871) Martin Thomson
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4871) Mark Nottingham