Re: Questions about stream state transitions

Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi> Thu, 18 July 2013 08:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A59621F9FFB for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 01:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.932
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.932 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.667, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kbdoG3gbkCDD for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 01:10:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F9C21F9D93 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 01:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UzjGz-0002eC-5P for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 08:09:13 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 08:09:13 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UzjGz-0002eC-5P@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>) id 1UzjGq-0002dF-ED for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 08:09:04 +0000
Received: from emh03.mail.saunalahti.fi ([62.142.5.109]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>) id 1UzjGo-0008D2-N3 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 08:09:04 +0000
Received: from saunalahti-vams (vs3-12.mail.saunalahti.fi [62.142.5.96]) by emh03.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with SMTP id 325E0188796; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 11:08:39 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from emh07.mail.saunalahti.fi ([62.142.5.117]) by vs3-12.mail.saunalahti.fi ([62.142.5.96]) with SMTP (gateway) id A056EB16ECC; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 11:08:39 +0300
Received: from LK-Perkele-VII (a88-112-44-140.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.112.44.140]) by emh07.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B103FDA; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 11:08:38 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 11:08:38 +0300
From: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>
To: Shigeki Ohtsu <ohtsu@iij.ad.jp>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20130718080838.GA880@LK-Perkele-VII>
References: <51E6908F.2010602@iij.ad.jp> <CABkgnnVRuSRwr+3RQd=5+nMcz5Mhy3mavSXc15wi_0ZFd5yo8g@mail.gmail.com> <51E78D77.7060000@iij.ad.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51E78D77.7060000@iij.ad.jp>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>
X-Antivirus: VAMS
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=62.142.5.109; envelope-from=ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi; helo=emh03.mail.saunalahti.fi
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.499, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UzjGo-0008D2-N3 536a2e09d9b4946ec0098a56dbf9e7ea
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Questions about stream state transitions
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20130718080838.GA880@LK-Perkele-VII>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18839
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 03:38:47PM +0900, Shigeki Ohtsu wrote:
> Thanks for answers, they are very helpful for me.
> 
> Following comments, I've update the table in
> 
> http://html5.ohtsu.org/HTTP2_Stream_State.pdf
> 
> Please review this if it is correct and I've also submitted a new PR of

Eh, HEADERS in Reserved (remote) transitions to half closed (local)
regardless of END_STREAM? That looks bit suspicious.

Also, I think that anytime DATA can be successfully received,
WINDOW_UPDATE can be sent (half closed (local) seems to violate
that).

-Ilari