IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Static Table Entries

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 08 August 2014 20:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E7041A038E for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 13:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cwVGPe9ZWS4S for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 13:07:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D51291A038C for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 13:07:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XFqPX-0005ZT-Do for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 20:05:11 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 20:05:11 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XFqPX-0005ZT-Do@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1XFqPF-0004Hi-1f for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 20:04:53 +0000
Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1XFqPE-0003dt-Av for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 20:04:53 +0000
Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id a1so5990522wgh.35 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 13:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=BnrSaGMMHEk/82ThoI0z+rIVjf4V4ZUknTJncajJPSA=; b=ze40PzTTdkYjy7SrtYbq1FiXM8WSsc0AFtjLc02xdp+J/HUQic9U8Y4K9bQ3eAwufP SMfuneOXSA90/TQr32snPGvA/mKdR4409tyBOX3NeJ8HMDLbxP2vzVSG/q/NTTMeqASB 6Vwd1cREMW6j55xEuWrwjwH7L/7nDRCtG0U2DZ9r97iGbtm4SdrX1Q/hwSeGHMOAJUGo TByNDmwv1a6zSKrLB52j//LV+1uHqxe0uxzgUVwzlxw6Z/4dEyFnxKAEi8ZREeG2TUsD UhtjTPdELsecGLAWdhTIANBkq7Pp+9RkXUouyK6qtu1mWsw69uE27pahDXBFdW1JTOHk WhAA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.185.238 with SMTP id ff14mr34923020wjc.9.1407528266178; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 13:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.6.229 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 13:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D00A9F19.38FE8%Robby.Simpson@GE.com>
References: <D00955B6.38F98%Robby.Simpson@GE.com> <CABkgnnVi7E3BMfYL1V3sS0Dn5WGJ2MaN1aCsxFoQmNtV4EfNog@mail.gmail.com> <D00A9F19.38FE8%Robby.Simpson@GE.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 13:04:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWw6QOQJSufvZZikkN1PxWjuRBQTPOjkM+yU2tv9E7=WQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: "Simpson, Robby (GE Energy Management)" <robby.simpson@ge.com>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.125.82.52; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-wg0-f52.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.743, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1XFqPE-0003dt-Av d24354e79fa5c9efe302448dd815cacf
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Static Table Entries
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnWw6QOQJSufvZZikkN1PxWjuRBQTPOjkM+yU2tv9E7=WQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/26579
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 8 August 2014 12:46, Simpson, Robby (GE Energy Management)
<robby.simpson@ge.com> wrote:
> One other issue I've found in the static table entries:  I've noted that
> they are all in alphabetical order, which makes searching much easier.
> However, there appears to be one outlier -- "accept."  Since "/" comes
> before "/index.html", shouldn't "accept" come before "accept-charset",
> etc.?

Ordering is another area where we didn't have good enough data.

And yes, accept is lexically before accept-charset.  See previous
comments. I'm sure that will annoy some people, but I'm honest enough
to admit that I get a small amount of enjoyment from annoying the
obsessive-compulsive.

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status