Re: HTTP/2 examples SHOULD use :authority

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 02 December 2016 00:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E28129A04 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:09:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nHsD1Td-nPh9 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:09:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22EAE129A0D for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:09:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cCbM7-0001lq-A3 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:05:35 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:05:35 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cCbM7-0001lq-A3@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1cCbLv-0001kI-Nw for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:05:23 +0000
Received: from mail-qt0-f179.google.com ([209.85.216.179]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1cCbLo-00071V-FO for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:05:17 +0000
Received: by mail-qt0-f179.google.com with SMTP id w33so237059966qtc.3 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 16:04:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=QxQPVlsFKFrYiKwgPg323ca7E1lMKXMxeRbufMRKd8I=; b=PcBaVVlhU5R6Yav340qJ+INYoDvqQE0+MtLc999kPLyXMOaLd6zH9Lg/YbCzQg+w4g wRIZfxAtuBfQxT+uu1aul+rOl695sN+vODlj+M0KZkrdn6UgTSdBXDD6sVPowk6l4Z1l mg5wfJSnTBNTuefFX+vj/5IGjwyRpRFZEwDUkCaIFhaFF4qw5Jd53M0zSqwX/sJjTKzw WNi4ih62J/QuuD8JX1NswNQWjxYCjX3/JkCDqJR4iO0zSlQ6WUW08/KgEXCO67ohhGKC iqWfPeY4XYh3IzWxw1L+LngV+NWnWXTlS0aYTDR6g2GlSF8of+TJWlv5XBbKJvVxAVd0 gwsw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QxQPVlsFKFrYiKwgPg323ca7E1lMKXMxeRbufMRKd8I=; b=lFqMHMLVVI8qyi2VTU9dOyj3kRpyiVyBzM12YsyVXUq2Mkhcqmtff6e1Q1573Pt3aY rmMvUdiznI5EEcL+4oOrzAVz6dvN1gMfjzmtaNKg7ZAI4cvna+RItjWPE855nTLTzUGj +SSGXcfZD7PCQ26GTDAivNxoRQYJZC9ddtoFenqFObylkvQYGWBppCcsakK8bcTu0wad E8yXWLPsAiULJsIYvoRRdgug8DoeOe/EcWvyaCWvxmjg/iRuUeOfWghNHbxw7dEUpfTG lkb7wpcbfkoFUFO1K4eYt7oAW1RsU6D0+zEPhCBjBJN+SSlfFX71yrCEsvatVy031Lmy fpPw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01/w9NC7jDzKy5/gkE222t/iOVBtIWi5xbuVxO+G0Q7hXB0H7BA1IkoXu3dS3917lA5gM7D9ZQp/oIDFg==
X-Received: by 10.237.44.161 with SMTP id g30mr36784909qtd.144.1480637089890; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 16:04:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.38.233 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:04:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3a933ef3-922e-6b83-e379-b7efbb968242@measurement-factory.com>
References: <4ea740d1-1df8-5a76-5198-dfd45b46955e@measurement-factory.com> <CABkgnnW5NSHEsv4NG_R4wf96SMc--vBkJ=zjG1QsUHJ9-6FyFA@mail.gmail.com> <3a933ef3-922e-6b83-e379-b7efbb968242@measurement-factory.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 11:04:49 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWmSw6khoRDX62L8WV4dzCyi=QWHZ=qkZOf8fYkYtwPUA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.216.179; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-qt0-f179.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.847, BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1cCbLo-00071V-FO c1e0caa88bd94a4783f63522f56d760a
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: HTTP/2 examples SHOULD use :authority
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnWmSw6khoRDX62L8WV4dzCyi=QWHZ=qkZOf8fYkYtwPUA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33073
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2 December 2016 at 10:19, Alex Rousskov
<rousskov@measurement-factory.com> wrote:
> I believe we are on the same page. If there is a consensus that this
> problem deserves an errata, I would be happy to propose a specific
> change. Otherwise, this email thread itself may help those confused by
> the examples.


I can't speak for others, but I wouldn't be opposed to an erratum that
suggested the change I described.