Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt

Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com> Wed, 02 November 2016 02:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B5E12946F for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 19:45:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZE36Ic0y8-L9 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 19:45:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 083A912007C for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 19:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1c1lUE-0000zz-AS for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 02:41:10 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 02:41:10 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1c1lUE-0000zz-AS@frink.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <kazuhooku@gmail.com>) id 1c1lU8-0000zA-GI for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 02:41:04 +0000
Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <kazuhooku@gmail.com>) id 1c1lU2-000596-I2 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 02:40:59 +0000
Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id a197so112379621wmd.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 19:40:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MZvWA88sHWVl4aF9TfOeYM+xnbWFCUmNDgxuN0pcHc8=; b=mSag/BGdonNi/NH3TlOizfJSpqEq5OfrlI3mfR1w0jUIxUgSGeX5a4uY0bU6M6a41c UFV5b7f9ylS4KMjsaB4LUIHVzTfeJcUVseklO5MUHLAVWRsppfBCGzM3R2G7FZ0jA0U8 dRMqflfLyaggbdqGlUADaGCrxuMAV1lB2Sf2KiNgzINA8I6ATeJR3HgTCevma5Z47DBK B6C8GjEZy7D4z+GcA54gbeuMNoRUyyhCvZ3er4W6QsW2KO41/qZe9t7KK/hT2CAMRX9J zN/1diMEAPxzbjL2uAleU/jCsFdkZ4iH5x7zPdiv8UercIm0dr0s8bHQfahvDjwTT39j YTeQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MZvWA88sHWVl4aF9TfOeYM+xnbWFCUmNDgxuN0pcHc8=; b=AdcqI6KhMyQ49lSptKwrkqW+u6iltjVY74upje4Ri/CJdpPo6fI25MV2GSpBY2iJq8 OnVEYwHSuW858mO5UtDwpYV5QnfwSF8z4xUnPpSRhcvln5CkMyq1FSpMHs7D5ZmKYA8B NSo/LE1BnMC1pJBsRm/owv+++pVSdDrz5v2P0Pix58evc8R5UhDv1lNwWs5Tr97fy0XT 1ghwZPIwkQeNIyJId29ZnIEPhq+UnoOSPrcmA8lAoeruyRrx4T455OTa9KfjQ107GMMi XXuiz6C/voadgUwjebWPmv0bH/aFCAxVHosf37wZp+2cmeUZZhJXdae2r74/ScfFmdR6 U31w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcSCwqy+mwr8i+aFXwE1SANcJqJcmqAZvPDGtQlljg+T+1qy+eEPlGwSRztqh9/oYIuqLrSrqcoz3o4cQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.155.35 with SMTP id vt3mr761141wjb.223.1478054431288; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 19:40:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.163.69 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 19:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <B52D8EDA-CBD3-48D6-97D3-0FBCD5F9F401@lukasa.co.uk>
References: <147792294052.32397.15544665152412530374.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CANatvzwm_T-HW0yT1MAWEUrfw5OAVkmAZe890575qg8HuU9Z_Q@mail.gmail.com> <86447165-100C-407D-8512-A32F93B11BBA@lukasa.co.uk> <CANatvzzRvbEjy4AqDHeRtQfcJX0Ls14qJf0qv0QWZBMMd-HRnQ@mail.gmail.com> <5f155947-e74c-0761-b5d4-64f8aabec846@gmx.de> <F2EE2E10-9129-47D4-8C6E-BEE079503F34@lukasa.co.uk> <BN6PR03MB27088EF1361F6ED49A3E378C87A10@BN6PR03MB2708.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <B52D8EDA-CBD3-48D6-97D3-0FBCD5F9F401@lukasa.co.uk>
From: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 11:40:30 +0900
Message-ID: <CANatvzz1nC5yrf7TFnU63FhrHRWq3sVOj2NtNz4xg-PVSsP4LQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>
Cc: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.125.82.44; envelope-from=kazuhooku@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm0-f44.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.373, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1c1lU2-000596-I2 56b92b7106a5fc0b8a391971d169a005
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-early-hints-status-code-00.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CANatvzz1nC5yrf7TFnU63FhrHRWq3sVOj2NtNz4xg-PVSsP4LQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32801
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

2016-11-02 7:08 GMT+09:00 Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>uk>:
>
>> On 1 Nov 2016, at 17:24, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>
>> FWIW, our implementation should already ignore this response and process the final status code correctly.  If you have a public endpoint that returns a hint, we can all do a quick field test.
>
> Were you interested in a HTTP/1.1 or HTTP/2 endpoint? I can put one up that unconditionally returns a 103, though it may just be easier to spin up H2O or nghttp2.

I would very much appreciate it if you or somebody else could setup a
server that returns 103 so that people could check.

I won't have time for doing that myself for a week or so, and at the
moment H2O is incapable for sending 103 (it only recognizes 103 sent
from upstream and converts it into H2 push).

> Cory
>



-- 
Kazuho Oku