IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Design Issue: Max Concurrent Streams Limit and Unidirectional Streams

James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Thu, 02 May 2013 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C5821F919A for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 May 2013 10:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.542
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.542 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.057, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7kqO58zsuzXX for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 May 2013 10:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63DE821F90A1 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 2 May 2013 10:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UXxW4-000327-Jn for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 17:42:00 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 17:42:00 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UXxW4-000327-Jn@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jasnell@gmail.com>) id 1UXxVt-00031I-R1 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 17:41:49 +0000
Received: from mail-oa0-f45.google.com ([209.85.219.45]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jasnell@gmail.com>) id 1UXxVr-0000sj-BA for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 17:41:48 +0000
Received: by mail-oa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id o17so820893oag.32 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 02 May 2013 10:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=XjfmzSbPsuy4GMQDh6n3pJP05k+9jrQQ5UE2JwQwOkI=; b=fZfvn8bxU7a+9Am0y4HYLJmTWHI04yr+x1BNbaZF3b1FIKGj/YOEBaV6elBxwY4nzJ vygapVy8DRxr22hwkliS60MCR4TOfXJ77skb4iNMnGguFoUyO50bFJZO61mzaHmmH0et n+SVfGWuOcZ5sEcw+NAZoxX9T3xlvwv8PM3ZDkhJs8dXVg0poV6mqk5vEl0UEpS5ssK+ FF2eftrVm20hKHUNc87PDMpn25GJScBb4jGmKbb9I2F8upiVZ8UfQTwuDqcTnSILDIIe puILo0+ECX/sr35vYa6mrGnXB59wFZHfdrmz+rAspfWBxUwtzFbfQeISQ7yL71hoJsXu 0fdw==
X-Received: by 10.60.141.226 with SMTP id rr2mr2048887oeb.35.1367516481362; Thu, 02 May 2013 10:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.3.137 with HTTP; Thu, 2 May 2013 10:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUeicCNUa70GW7Vv9-bbwLPiPM=2-_t28Qz5o6DT0jF8Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABP7RbdBe-Xkx+CMvpN=_oNAqm6SyLyL+XNHRUKSqn8mjSDw1Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYgCiyWerT0tUUVKcbNPqdTGuXHd_MG59DjcUsEWst5t7g@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnVdU=cZ53Bqg5Un=E80NMpcgYO37DVmwUFW0O-i7SNf8w@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYhz64FsEGgGhx91RfWwuPPxWdAkesOV-bmqWVWE7ZxdjA@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbcKQkn1o4WZscwNmSmm6YzqE_TKxPr4jnozNdaVqpZ7=A@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYhF6rAZoYEaz4aJO6xawaJxzxGt=Bkg4H9eBOP-LBSRmQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+FsNezQzxdZEJY_2_0h_TR2pBbVsGyGBhQhKcm-65pt6S8rQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbevS8M0q9OxzPncqY_gE34q5-ymdg2hOX2SQgSUNkhzsw@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYjAbuUqz9RdO+-p3a4EsyuS=Gv0rS-U-Vh+ZCjtDjFy6w@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+FsNec2LLZMjtGhSX-1q8qg66WtBoM5K0yMrs5m4VKXb5OVg@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYgAT64jj=Am06MsA02A+eAcDrVbbgb4opO37bnMkWTPfg@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7Rbdgz=kRZPfjHK5UUfieq8uz=ToQZjFt1-+s9scj1CogmA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYjSjFKSdbj=QBLn0T4ufhzF1hUY=O=Qa2dfnkTzMXF0bg@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbejssYWH+nEumVX__+4TnE1ec8e1YXeY8kqWF+AgszTrg@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYiRVxM78Dr+eh9ksVvW_9=S01mHxt_Wr+SyaVECmc0e-g@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbexX0T=yYKPeKFeGEnzMAcO7fAifZh6LfLCOngLDNQHUA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUeicCNUa70GW7Vv9-bbwLPiPM=2-_t28Qz5o6DT0jF8Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 10:41:01 -0700
Message-ID: <CABP7RbfbmTqFHPkRvj2K6iZ=Oo7MsT3hD9Y33fmtU9HOLoDmUA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.219.45; envelope-from=jasnell@gmail.com; helo=mail-oa0-f45.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.701, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1UXxVr-0000sj-BA 64ee50d99db1083d702443897dc3620e
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Design Issue: Max Concurrent Streams Limit and Unidirectional Streams
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABP7RbfbmTqFHPkRvj2K6iZ=Oo7MsT3hD9Y33fmtU9HOLoDmUA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17788
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

That works too. If folks are agreement on that particular approach I
can work up the spec changes necessary to describe stream state in
those terms.

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Martin Thomson
<martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that this is going in the wrong direction.
>
> If you consider that streams are not the owners of state, but each
> direction is the owner of state, then this whole issue disappears.
> For a push, the client->server direction never opens*.  Simple.  No
> flags.
>
>[snip[

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email