Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 31 March 2015 22:24 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ADF71AD0C7 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.712
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.712 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HsyjbCWa8C69 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C90A31ACF03 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1Yd4W7-0001Ad-A9 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:20:15 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:20:15 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1Yd4W7-0001Ad-A9@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1Yd4Vz-000178-JS for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:20:07 +0000
Received: from mail-ob0-f178.google.com ([209.85.214.178]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1Yd4Vy-0006x8-RP for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:20:07 +0000
Received: by obvd1 with SMTP id d1so50602987obv.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vpZY+WaVUYJxGkRYkD70Zm7sTtAzvgHzByf+LhRWUQY=; b=TYWcjZQLR/M1K7KPKlebWp7Q6WGzVJW5qWRvZy+Ad7KHeiEPiELg0bq1N+Dmj94jcM 4LPh0+nZAv5sbep2wvqOlsks+CoE9ywi0qtvXniTFLBo7J9bDXrMCjxIR70WDIJjdy0/ B1RV86KiCN6CEabGRkOgm2miX9fkd7ARoui+LaE3pg1IBaIiE1uvvQlodyfccBVBaQ64 I/yMfEuXeGsVrnQwgHwjkxhH57YM77LZ3CWPXhFCBO7RlUmJWUhyi+O/sqVVgNgjafrt eU1AdekJ0fgr/WijZHyAwYfjUFQ45cce+oydpMBUbj8nHJVdevQb1bjQhN7tdekgMjnt Z7kg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.101.195 with SMTP id fi3mr3246760oeb.65.1427840381218; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.48.151 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACMu3tqpQFzCJHRW8DjwhveLY5+-0YAb+owgTBbfevONu7nvXA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKwtvnAtuF-X3pgbgLe7VAdnMd4+Yy1EeZLaHgyXXTnZRBgFZw@mail.gmail.com> <CACMu3toR56=u+XG1qtGD=HP9Sy32rd_23QNRMzX3+XwucFYxhA@mail.gmail.com> <CACMu3toheWOPAmEFyuM-uH1NZkL-g2Tw-CuFbv_5fAOG8tyY-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAKwtvnDh+mmJjf0V6UzZimX7ng0Um8StTdQd=Ej=-rHeWGjLOQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACMu3tqpQFzCJHRW8DjwhveLY5+-0YAb+owgTBbfevONu7nvXA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:19:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWbOUoRv0rCJ=WHnVnThaPOdOeXtxyXTLWi-7ZyrdZ4dQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Bence Béky <bnc@chromium.org>
Cc: Vimala Tadepalli <vimla.c@gmail.com>, HTTP <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.178; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-ob0-f178.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.847, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1Yd4Vy-0006x8-RP 5f3c349820a602163212578b76df844e
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnWbOUoRv0rCJ=WHnVnThaPOdOeXtxyXTLWi-7ZyrdZ4dQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29147
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
On 31 March 2015 at 13:17, Bence Béky <bnc@chromium.org> wrote: > Sorry, I forgot about that. In that case, you are right, there is no > way to avoid re-encoding the header. There is: if you aren't doing anything more than adding a header field, as long as you choose a literal representation and you also pass through all messages that relate to the header table (max size, everything) verbatim, you can shim this in. You won't learn much in the process though unless you maintain your own table because you won't be able to decode header fields without the header table.
- Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0 Roberto Peon
- Header addition with HTTP 2.0 Vimala Tadepalli
- Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0 Vimala Tadepalli
- Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0 Roberto Peon
- Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0 Vimala Tadepalli
- Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0 Vimala Tadepalli
- Fwd: Header addition with HTTP 2.0 Bence Béky
- Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0 Bence Béky
- Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0 Vimala Tadepalli
- Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0 Bence Béky
- Re: [Moderator Action] Header addition with HTTP … Bence Béky
- Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0 Martin Thomson
- Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0 Amos Jeffries