IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call for Adoption: Extensible Prioritization Scheme for HTTP

Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Fri, 06 December 2019 03:20 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A037120058 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 19:20:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.651
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.651 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CC8QsdtQH41g for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 19:20:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2F0B12000F for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 19:20:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1id47P-0003ST-6t for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 03:17:23 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2019 03:17:23 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1id47P-0003ST-6t@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4c]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <w@1wt.eu>) id 1id47L-0003Rd-7E for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 03:17:19 +0000
Received: from wtarreau.pck.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60] helo=1wt.eu) by titan.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <w@1wt.eu>) id 1id47J-000390-LX for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 03:17:19 +0000
Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id xB63H6IP024252; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 04:17:06 +0100
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2019 04:17:06 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>
Cc: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20191206031706.GA24243@1wt.eu>
References: <9F1A17D3-C801-42E3-B020-1447E5D172CC@apple.com> <CAOdDvNovmPLpJT+ZDzyr3RYDxjCz6TXtst7wLnjQaxVZ65sj9w@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR22MB201038E8BE98AC36963197C5DA5C0@DM6PR22MB2010.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR22MB201038E8BE98AC36963197C5DA5C0@DM6PR22MB2010.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=62.212.114.60; envelope-from=w@1wt.eu; helo=1wt.eu
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1id47J-000390-LX 1fd54dd993ef224cc8d4a3ffe25a0f8e
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: Extensible Prioritization Scheme for HTTP
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/20191206031706.GA24243@1wt.eu>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37204
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 08:32:56PM +0000, Mike Bishop wrote:
> I also support adoption.  The e2e/h2h distinction is tricky, and beyond the
> immediate usefulness of this work, it's also a good venue in which to work
> out the distinction between those two concepts.

Same for me.

Willy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email