Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and HTTP Authentication
William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> Wed, 24 April 2013 16:51 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0895821F93E6 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:51:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.676
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.676 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TfrQPieZaAYR for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87AA21F9305 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:51:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UV2ta-0005Df-8a for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:50:14 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:50:14 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UV2ta-0005Df-8a@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <willchan@google.com>) id 1UV2tQ-0005Cn-Kf for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:50:04 +0000
Received: from mail-qe0-f53.google.com ([209.85.128.53]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <willchan@google.com>) id 1UV2tL-0006G9-QB for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:50:04 +0000
Received: by mail-qe0-f53.google.com with SMTP id i11so1370799qej.26 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=PIf87yZgYOAMa3uWYBm6jWth/xZ+gGhIvFGuH293Snk=; b=MXHXL5n6JNCjbJj3ZUJQB3bohYVo0a5bhdjRh0ASeIml0+Gk8q/MEllFcKk2WDn1Vi Yq5PgF+y1K63iubqm8lNquEHE3OcRVV5jnIfgykXWNnJZg9wodab8D+aweRke3TQcv2y 6rVTB5Ms6exorRL9uYVbQaFZzgGIOaaSxa42OzMrNIvxSDhYGBvnj/Ugb6jAfDZa58QT yN9B3DTJsWmnHr0h6hCTBxDKSwS+BGNVxxThxuPskGNM/L9EvtJYdWtdgz6KQCGNGSQb x0Gt+kMLkVXXh5DH8ZDT1f7o98qPX+N7rZEmIqVpVGBHai5jHsVP1Ogdwp/9uoK2yzOH akGg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=PIf87yZgYOAMa3uWYBm6jWth/xZ+gGhIvFGuH293Snk=; b=jJiCSQP19pDcVDP9o7dOd1fubvIeHc6WpmKH9G55CLSMxOx+/2PTBkXYrRsHucteiA TfcrmIoQt09IiY3nlpGCN9a9u1OII25yvdfMR9GJWkpaUJS2acDbRlgBLSrR89g5m3HS BFIp8Yx8UH4XQA2K7eG6Hi3WQbtt4vpp5eggc=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=PIf87yZgYOAMa3uWYBm6jWth/xZ+gGhIvFGuH293Snk=; b=gyGkFjfdcB9yjMSVCOaXJXwoQ6RrAjYnQ8WYVrlDtm0Q8VjfU6pOEj2ki19xTe/pkG hfZHnKEdufED/OlEl8nxw+EvuY9IofhG5LUUUkkyt69t/gzatGsnSs95o1qtP660XT2A 4n1wPl22WRk1h/tBfSalBqEJAyiVK28qajyMhfjiVDP+4Lo6nFBB4Xo2NdsxZP5yW6My 4ZgwZkc2k8MwWhG64TAwQnwGuPgP4HMCiKQmLBm0Zd80B74rPWQLsv7mlV7GkihcZ6BG 9v32IS0lS3X7qSwU+ky/B5X8zi1vA9x0kKxE31WjukpPOHtn8QodR5stcAZOh8oXN75i rG+g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.186.11 with SMTP id cq11mr31358434qab.13.1366822173962; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: willchan@google.com
Received: by 10.229.180.4 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CANmPAYEirEfpM6kEuxaM3OF7hsjWu8_Lr0aWfQ+btkEGOH3Vsw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <14A09626-8397-4656-A042-FEFDDD017C9F@mnot.net> <CANmPAYH60+wmeYQAikUd4ps3HdPQSm80TeZbMW37LioBYVj-7A@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYjOPgCse6giEmy3f_MzRTC3K25oAWeAavHnzywc5pL91w@mail.gmail.com> <CANmPAYGr8QDhmLR50UzWYWK_fNYzGbF_P9EN0dOadmL-wQy61g@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYjDoRFwPJNWzRqQHdBbV+DjF0mv8OO4RWTBSmh6=Dcnxw@mail.gmail.com> <CANmPAYEirEfpM6kEuxaM3OF7hsjWu8_Lr0aWfQ+btkEGOH3Vsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:49:33 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: EmTDEJvO-bhDdUmDcGSBeOklFgI
Message-ID: <CAA4WUYjGaZRVm3NtmT5qO3j7QKNZZiX7zBEV-pDhK0VGGSxuUg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>
To: Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf30334f35268ce604db1e1628"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQntf5E2TNEc/zHes8N6V3/29GT54ffWaIilmyTk2Ei/6FYwuePgqTZwmVW7e0RHTE47z5PYfYZDTdKrHGHq7bHahhd/IFqxCtcovwqaqqzpEJRnxU9szJK+ZPyx0xV20Y7IGBTO8hhsn5tK7vobk9Z7qatbvRBlC/H4rckV5nYjqK0W5rSLWFwpSy9gwcuz2lyshxSi
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.128.53; envelope-from=willchan@google.com; helo=mail-qe0-f53.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.712, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1UV2tL-0006G9-QB a99ef82659c6e05382cbe172001b3cf5
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and HTTP Authentication
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAA4WUYjGaZRVm3NtmT5qO3j7QKNZZiX7zBEV-pDhK0VGGSxuUg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17540
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Yep, but no, it hasn't gone anywhere. On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi William, > > Is this draft by Roberto Peon the one you were referring to? > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rpeon-httpbis-exproxy-00 > > Has this gone anywhere? > > I'm looking to design and build a "trusted proxy" that aligns with the > browser development roadmap/vision in order to provide web acceleration > functionality and so would like to get involved in this process if still > active. > > Thanks, > > Peter > > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:57 PM, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org > > wrote: > >> On the contrary, I think it's great to have multiple proposals. If you >> have your own vision for how this should work, please send it out! :) My >> statement was simply an FYI, not a "back off, we've got this!" >> >> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Perfect then I'll sit tight. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:43 PM, William Chan (陈智昌) < >>> willchan@chromium.org> wrote: >>> >>>> FYI, we (google spdy team) have been discussing a "trusted proxy" >>>> internally and I think Roberto's got a draft in the works. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Mark, >>>>> >>>>> Earlier this group discussed the idea of a "trusted proxy". Does that >>>>> fall under the HTTP/2.0 category? >>>>> >>>>> I may have some cycles for this. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Peter >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Just a reminder that we're still accepting proposals for: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. HTTP/2.0 >>>>>> 2. New HTTP authentication schemes >>>>>> >>>>>> As per our charter <http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/charter/>. >>>>>> >>>>>> So far, we've received the following proposals applicable to HTTP/2.0: >>>>>> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki/Http2Proposals> >>>>>> >>>>>> But none yet for authentication schemes: >>>>>> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/wiki/HttpAuthProposals> >>>>>> >>>>>> As communicated in Paris, the deadline for proposals is 15 June, >>>>>> 2012. It's fine if your proposal isn't complete, but we do need to have a >>>>>> good sense of it by then, for discussion. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
- Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and HTTP … Mark Nottingham
- Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and H… James M Snell
- Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and H… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and H… James M Snell
- Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and H… Willy Tarreau
- Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and H… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and H… Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and H… Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and H… Willy Tarreau
- RE: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP Authentic… lionel.morand
- Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and H… Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and H… James M Snell
- RE: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP Authentic… lionel.morand
- Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and H… Peter Lepeska
- Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and H… William Chan (陈智昌)
- Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and H… Peter Lepeska
- Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and H… William Chan (陈智昌)
- Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP Authentic… Mark Nottingham
- RE: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP Authentic… lionel.morand
- Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP Authentic… Mark Nottingham
- RE: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP Authentic… lionel.morand
- Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and H… Nicolas Mailhot
- RE: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP Authentic… Markus.Isomaki
- Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and H… Peter Lepeska
- Re: Reminder: Call for Proposals - HTTP/2.0 and H… William Chan (陈智昌)
- Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Peter Lepeska
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Stephen Farrell
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Peter Lepeska
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Yoav Nir
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Roberto Peon
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Peter Lepeska
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Stephen Farrell
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Fabian Keil
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Peter Lepeska
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Stephen Farrell
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Peter Lepeska
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Stephen Farrell
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Albert Lunde
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Stephen Farrell
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Peter Lepeska
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Peter Lepeska
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Roberto Peon
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Benjamin Carlyle
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Adrien W. de Croy
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Stephen Farrell
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Adrien W. de Croy
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Roberto Peon
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Roberto Peon
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Roberto Peon
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Adrien W. de Croy
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Roberto Peon
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Adrien W. de Croy
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Stephen Farrell
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Roberto Peon
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Stephen Farrell
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Roberto Peon
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Werner Baumann
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Stephen Farrell
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Yoav Nir
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Adrien W. de Croy
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Yoav Nir
- Re: Comments on Explicit/Trusted Proxy Adrien W. de Croy