Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt

Mike West <mkwst@google.com> Tue, 11 October 2016 08:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4365312942F for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 01:30:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.016
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.016 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OWZkSykPaFuV for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 01:30:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69184128E18 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 01:30:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1btsNP-0001YZ-RT for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 08:25:31 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 08:25:31 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1btsNP-0001YZ-RT@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mkwst@google.com>) id 1btsNH-0001Wf-Lf for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 08:25:23 +0000
Received: from mail-lf0-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mkwst@google.com>) id 1btsNF-0004qM-BN for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 08:25:22 +0000
Received: by mail-lf0-f48.google.com with SMTP id x79so29908443lff.0 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 01:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LQCacg50QsCq+Mdl07VcDA60b/SvaxNjh56cyVwuZBg=; b=PFUA/M03JqArz9QbBOzwhjTQv8+18cDMGYCZnfG0xQru3TiKp1dLk6RDlvKVkpZCFX ThTs+eOSfNmyTUWrot2Ky5pTFqRcKFDJYEKm9zQ7lWDzLSCrroOyesiOj3Rk7Ns+H6gX Wwm18ZLTVYLDeuvJ9b105D5hBz1KzMdprT8o69FtANKarf1Y0qgt91g2o+IdlGHtTNKH QjlyUyBKof4UxuLYu31uLxrgsIEj0S8phZVy26yAidEcDZxTpfFJxic2arQCeb48VR+i wx328siEgl5VJa2fJwp58ko98fzR9p9J3ebFfHp37uS77n7++ygfaj8GpIKr7kCo3CIL sTPg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LQCacg50QsCq+Mdl07VcDA60b/SvaxNjh56cyVwuZBg=; b=kbIHsMOndWoGpFeqJY4lFtTWzcoMaGlmhNlaO1jLFm1xQZ4+iQujqTCb/3qiwnbYVk Hquoq+zJcTYTqguCUTtvs5YZydfrrppLpsHG07HoHOzC+5uJSCtoweY8bDE7dYda2OEx S/BaMWTnQ1Sama7TBsl3c74AlrqAMVgpI9wTBSpvbZ250745k6sBR8r7t/VZ419HlHZA KTUMSJx/rGPEP2qaiMYILSU0zNFAjiN82Qsf/DTizSRxGILccDy8WyAM+Hp8qJYNc4f3 Qgw5g9s3RteUxyVxw7UYYPfzraHkzUogRbqxlh61N0OEguQysT/hYumYuUBi0Cmwp2ZR zwlQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkzdMWC/GOam+QUq1nXX/6yjAytCBVGIr0ZrNkSPFPftS4gGRUy/gB2KCS4ilQgIAFkn6VQQ7+5gkRpUY1h
X-Received: by 10.25.34.11 with SMTP id i11mr1787052lfi.119.1476174293824; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 01:24:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.20.230 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 01:24:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <42B9174B-2A49-4E21-B607-E60D05952561@mnot.net>
References: <147614675047.31404.6416168532325888959.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161011035143.EF7DF13664@welho-filter2.welho.com> <42B9174B-2A49-4E21-B607-E60D05952561@mnot.net>
From: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:24:33 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKXHy=f=tNi5mft02y_rhg9tbP8J5wDLSR1=MmJeys+7tUWC0A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Kari hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113aa910695fcc053e929c4c
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.215.48; envelope-from=mkwst@google.com; helo=mail-lf0-f48.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=2.004, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.336, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1btsNF-0004qM-BN 77828fa21ed0389cc5ad2e76073839fe
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAKXHy=f=tNi5mft02y_rhg9tbP8J5wDLSR1=MmJeys+7tUWC0A@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32554
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Mark filed https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/243, and I
fixed it in
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/79fc688f3b95febb9b53e2500221697cab563f8a.
I'm sure we'll find more formatting issues over the next week or so that
arose from the port from the flat text file to Markdown, so I'll hold off
on publishing a -01 draft until those shake out.

Thanks!

-mike

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> Hi Kari,
>
> The best thing to do here is to file an issue, so it doesn't get lost; if
> you don't have a github account, tell me and I'll file it for you.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> > On 11 Oct. 2016, at 2:51 pm, Kari hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00
> >
> >
> > Looking
> >
> > https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=rfc6265&url2=
> draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00
> >
> > 5.1.3.  Domain Matching
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-
> 00#section-5.1.3
> >
> > There is some nested lists lost.
> >
> > |   o  The domain string and the string are identical.  (Note that both
> > |      the domain string and the string will have been canonicalized to
> > |      lower case at this point.)
> > |   o  All of the following conditions hold:
> > |   o  The domain string is a suffix of the string.
> > |   o  The last character of the string that is not included in the
> > |      domain string is a %x2E (".") character.
> > |   o  The string is a host name (i.e., not an IP address
> >
> > These should be on nested list, I think:
> >
> > |   o  The domain string is a suffix of the string.
> > |   o  The last character of the string that is not included in the
> > |      domain string is a %x2E (".") character.
> > |   o  The string is a host name (i.e., not an IP address
> >
> >
> > RFC 6265 was
> >
> > 5.1.3.  Domain Matching
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6265#section-5.1.3
> >
> >
> > |   o  The domain string and the string are identical.  (Note that both
> > |      the domain string and the string will have been canonicalized to
> > |      lower case at this point.)
> > |
> > |   o  All of the following conditions hold:
> > |
> > |      *  The domain string is a suffix of the string.
> > |
> > |      *  The last character of the string that is not included in the
> > |         domain string is a %x2E (".") character.
> > |
> > |      *  The string is a host name (i.e., not an IP address).
> >
> >
> > / Kari Hurtta
> >
> >
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>