Re: #495 WGLC: p4 editorial nits

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sat, 14 September 2013 15:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA77711E81E1 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 08:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.266
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.266 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.333, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2uffaJ-5G+If for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 08:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5804E11E80F6 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 08:53:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1VKs82-0005om-LV for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 15:51:22 +0000
Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 15:51:22 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1VKs82-0005om-LV@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1VKs7i-0005nC-2V for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 15:51:02 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1VKs7h-000247-9U for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 15:51:02 +0000
Received: from [192.168.2.117] ([93.217.108.110]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MTSrf-1VTUon15gl-00SKJy for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sat, 14 Sep 2013 17:50:34 +0200
Message-ID: <523485C6.9060007@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 17:50:30 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>
CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <5231CE0D.80309@andrew.cmu.edu> <52330FCC.2010400@gmx.de> <52331382.9050105@andrew.cmu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <52331382.9050105@andrew.cmu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:MwPvyiC7JkHa+qmlGwrCgTm43NmD+8elvh0e2hVSMns4R7qGl0B DkYZInYiFMSzwMg3VQe3uF69WKwBWpZa/gVQoH078ryAqJ2FBGvNfWeANJnSXdlo32wL8Gm +7ujE/sNntlojtEnVs8MdBmzGTwzh0kzWuuSAH4plAyKAfJN1emCcED/sBZT3fw3tHN+CfZ twP1k+0lK7rDNMi7Hd0HQ==
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.21; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.417, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1VKs7h-000247-9U 3f3386bf0bfd5362aefcbb4d52ae9bde
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: #495 WGLC: p4 editorial nits
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/523485C6.9060007@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/19635
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2013-09-13 15:30, Ken Murchison wrote:
> On 09/13/2013 09:14 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 2013-09-12 16:22, Ken Murchison wrote:
>>> Looking over the latest diffs I found a couple of typos:
>>>
>>> - Sec 3.4, 1st sent" "earlier or equal to" -> "earlier than or equal to"
>>>
>>> - Sec 3.4, para 5, 1st sent: "resource that resource" -> "resource that"
>>>
>>> - Sec 3.5, 1st para, 1st sent: "similar the If-Match and
>>> If-Unmodified-Since fields" -> "similar to the If-Match and
>>> If-Unmodified-Since header fields"
>>
>> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/2379>
>>
>
> Hi Julian,
>
> You missed adding "header" in the last change above.

See also <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/2388> 
(above), plus Roy's latest changes in 
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/2389> and 
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/2390>.

Best regards, Julian