IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Implementation Notes on Server Push

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 15 May 2013 20:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20ED21F86AE for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2013 13:38:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.166
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.166 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=3.433, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7O1i0+oe32qT for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2013 13:38:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B377421F8709 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2013 13:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UciRP-0000RJ-2w for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 15 May 2013 20:36:51 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 20:36:51 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UciRP-0000RJ-2w@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1UciRC-0000QV-01 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 15 May 2013 20:36:38 +0000
Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com ([209.85.212.175]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1UciR6-0005EH-Um for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 15 May 2013 20:36:37 +0000
Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hn14so3234839wib.14 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 15 May 2013 13:36:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=X92tVex/DRtN/fllcwWaCRwEsdG7OM4bplidM7m2aNk=; b=HfeCxOl1cYvsCCVwa3t47M+y84iYulK93cJqGGmv6ixW/Tj59O408GitEuhn8TQ3uK Qzz8HsI2TX0Wm0dxmRvpTXFjWOMA5EKi/us6sRjiLRsZ2Lf1uzRP+wDlaUqHThT5jd9B 2iDPkLWOn6xTOD/s/OkVjAIwqIYwuv/mblFkdBcdcMl2ovg2DWgyLQwK/5D1Vh1rK0bA 5ypUwIVTuwZq1X+6pfVmzbxIVOglSZzVqH99XMevRBy9TWPR7nQ1j9OXIKFLyqjFBkNb aRUTogf07n6wrzSIlEp8rsCf5mRp2LTb8HZTTOht01y+4pYe9hVIERTPZSESii2vpmej wnDA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.72.227 with SMTP id g3mr18020171wiv.1.1368650165807; Wed, 15 May 2013 13:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.20.135 with HTTP; Wed, 15 May 2013 13:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABP7RbftHeAQDiF7u8=nR-q0TVHYtHvSPUO+N48zJ=7Kj49fVQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOdDvNqXhG7+xbvBwctQCR4tZePKByw75SR5oBamXTymZa7myA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnURhLU3RJnMDxwErELedAmGKWcVgkE+B+Pn6vR3oYjJ6A@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+FsNcdAiK=Ddd1HTaYSuaTCj6OdKyQRCskuH2OZQ7um9TU6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbftHeAQDiF7u8=nR-q0TVHYtHvSPUO+N48zJ=7Kj49fVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 13:36:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVQgwaCHfqM7ihiQfzFv2+Xr_W7z-+BtwqHhwK=Ye=mhA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.212.175; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-wi0-f175.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.697, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1UciR6-0005EH-Um fd6694f9ace01d3ebecc6d269bc193ed
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Implementation Notes on Server Push
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnVQgwaCHfqM7ihiQfzFv2+Xr_W7z-+BtwqHhwK=Ye=mhA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18005
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 14 May 2013 18:24, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Splitting the initial window" seems wrong to me. Of course, I don't
> have a better suggestion at the moment, but if I did I'm not certain
> it would be this ;-)

Sorry, I wasn't clear enough.  That would be crazy-talk.  I meant to
split the initial window size configuration items.  Rather than "my
receive window starts at X", it will be "my receive window for
odd-numbered streams is X but for even-numbered stream it is Y."

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email