Re: RFC6265bis status

Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> Wed, 05 October 2016 20:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED33912946D for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 13:48:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.416
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.416 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LKy8-PakYyWN for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 13:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7279129467 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 13:48:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1brt2p-00020Q-Fv for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 20:44:03 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 20:44:03 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1brt2p-00020Q-Fv@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <phluid61@gmail.com>) id 1brt2l-0001xr-Ok for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 20:43:59 +0000
Received: from mail-it0-f52.google.com ([209.85.214.52]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <phluid61@gmail.com>) id 1brt2i-0001SS-KX for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 20:43:59 +0000
Received: by mail-it0-f52.google.com with SMTP id o19so6428765ito.1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 13:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=pYxMdt6z4hd56yxCwXJD9ETruyyRjv3peoNOfRiFgwE=; b=N0rmCa2AfdejCEZTUZ6ZWER0hUOgSBxS6iWsyubwpxvK3HdSgp1zXNxLTRQQXuTI2t wZVnux81sD0xlIYMq8lct1joYknW1NeDQsvYRt8CMdxKznklwbr86oFIOFWNaEQtdGfK 4JevEQMx0rPwQnu5PxVLq/18XIzQ/qOaeadKRBJtZxnoljWR26uF5L8xcXLl+HiY0Hm8 LC6gUIabzpLWV2/UhJJ8f3ViDOyF3hckQrSIzAqeSE11rWWHbqO5M6ByCY5W4bFnzEQS SwSkKIVLj/sZbaIG379jYDdIDWGm45M4VIyuPoj4qq6nPJNosQA8QvPLM5SZ63HEi59n 8TqQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pYxMdt6z4hd56yxCwXJD9ETruyyRjv3peoNOfRiFgwE=; b=SiY1Uy6gRuZOu7X0Gko7PRv9+dyUAUcSPkvHAWdELHRJNNM07x/xMBodgRWplpjCaz gTjfmaGHLpWcWBzLhQlzs/V8N3v/5wvuxQPLezhldN3hykDnNJPCOQpOATk4noOiKMsE pwV8D+gEVNGkn6+tFb4FuAxj0yfUXQd3jdDKRnT+Zc9yY5r77buYM+39DotXd64EXhuT gi4ZfI6gT9spP5lKXJiyxSszY1gvWR5RcWJA0jgqeY6Y63Nj6erV1409JiZ/oW5xXDFF HT+kIvB2ihrIIgTtR+eSJFkW9D/aMrfupprH2oXA7N2NEi+UO/ubEv4FWo5IP8sVgYk0 RLvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rno5ns9k9HUy03fB2JaNoghXMjrNqhG61SBhQJE0jMSv+K51vB50xYSOLj6YdQRT887ezkAV6nDrG8zqg==
X-Received: by 10.36.1.205 with SMTP id 196mr11132352itk.18.1475700210538; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 13:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: phluid61@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.158.207 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 13:43:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADYDTCCrfDpHACHpg2ApOjkiFcZFfcV425FCWU9h4RTFjADwoQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2D2BCE5A-4EFD-453F-A928-40200715E226@mnot.net> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610050751260.28134@tvnag.unkk.fr> <CADYDTCCrfDpHACHpg2ApOjkiFcZFfcV425FCWU9h4RTFjADwoQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 06:43:29 +1000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: dVeyMgTXDq9TrLNEQlofb4yT2ZE
Message-ID: <CACweHNCN-u2vLg3whMne=0P1tep53K3nWHqiSSuD9sMA5JuSvw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com>
Cc: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>, HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1143d41ad82194053e243ac8
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.52; envelope-from=phluid61@gmail.com; helo=mail-it0-f52.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.387, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1brt2i-0001SS-KX 4cd20e8850fb4c9343b29445f953025f
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: RFC6265bis status
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CACweHNCN-u2vLg3whMne=0P1tep53K3nWHqiSSuD9sMA5JuSvw@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32494
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 6 October 2016 at 03:05, Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com> wrote:

> ​On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> wrote:
>
>   https://curl.haxx.se/mail/lib-2016-09/0103.html
>>
>> The two points being:
>>  1 - Are they two cookies or one?
>>
>
> ​Those are clearly two different cookies. The one set without a domain is
> a "host" cookie and will only be returned to httpbin.org. The one with
> the .httpbin.org domain would also be returned to www.httpbin.org,
> foo.httpbin.org, etc.
>
>
​But you can make them both domain cookies:
http://httpbin.org/response-headers?Set-Cookie=foo=bar;domain=.httpbin.org&Set-Cookie=foo=qux;domain=httpbin.org

... which then, presumably, makes them identical, so it's the usual
last-one-wins? That seems to be how the httpbin.org server treats it,
anyway.

Cheers
-- 
  Matthew Kerwin
  http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/