Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-00.txt
Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> Wed, 20 August 2014 00:43 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3A21A6FEC for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 17:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l3MWH6lbw49D for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 17:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B62AB1A0313 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 17:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XJtxk-0006MI-5n for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:41:16 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:41:16 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XJtxk-0006MI-5n@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <gregw@intalio.com>) id 1XJtxS-0006LD-Fl for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:40:58 +0000
Received: from mail-we0-f178.google.com ([74.125.82.178]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <gregw@intalio.com>) id 1XJtxP-0004MZ-NR for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:40:58 +0000
Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id w61so7228698wes.9 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 17:40:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=8OcTsn2iO9LNCt8cfMpPc8wR0aVgBb3voElqE1FNK98=; b=fx0ZGwBzYmEnzESNRGzSiDUcNULb2hlM2QyQlozJoPRSw3noYDNLtl7CejaB5mLoj+ pBlxPtI8XpCkqkTTYVhi4b3m5IoJkbzmUcCx+d4noC8tNeOGFdgQaCdaw6ZxEWBSv9tN XxKukV/M3LFdklxQvXzFoDNCqnbOK/4IeUKEZzFBhYwf/ucM2HjO3Aowu+1oWDF7a1CI 0Vs5MuNLD4KQ6K72dHpM9L/yD5MqTi9PZrDgEOfJRxq2/IQamtSfZNpS9PYIZrNCdwZH bqej32MP59j1sJDMen+ktqO6egbhlOakgPL+2zocRc9K0yjrWvpd++/92djKEC/6dA7D Aosw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlH1Av3X4fYrZund3nTEL/XBOlmq/Sz0Iu5+pXy9l5RB9Y0gD4XNGJY2XOT+Fdwxms7Nzyk
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.119.41 with SMTP id kr9mr21611126wjb.114.1408495228766; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 17:40:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.169.98 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 17:40:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <858FBAA8-F0D5-43A0-A621-7D504AB3327A@mnot.net>
References: <20140818233839.23251.81316.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <858FBAA8-F0D5-43A0-A621-7D504AB3327A@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:40:28 +1000
Message-ID: <CAH_y2NEekpgDNO+OsDELarcSi3nn72gHb98L9R66TntcD9bUiQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e012297c0c764d2050104d972"
Received-SPF: permerror client-ip=74.125.82.178; envelope-from=gregw@intalio.com; helo=mail-we0-f178.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.081, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1XJtxP-0004MZ-NR 18dfd5f6344515d0e46e5bd7d311ca24
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-00.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAH_y2NEekpgDNO+OsDELarcSi3nn72gHb98L9R66TntcD9bUiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/26669
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Mark, Is there a specific use-case motivating this additional header? ie are there situations that a proxy can use this to do more than just log/debug a tunnel? I'm certainly not opposed to having the additional information that this header provides, but I'd like to know what advantage there is for a client to include the header. If there is none, then it is not likely to be sent. cheers -- Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales http://www.webtide.com advice and support for jetty and cometd.
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-00… internet-drafts
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protoco… Mark Nottingham
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protoco… Greg Wilkins
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protoco… Mark Nottingham
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protoco… Greg Wilkins
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protoco… Mark Nottingham
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protoco… Adam Rice
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protoco… Amos Jeffries
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protoco… Adam Rice
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protoco… Amos Jeffries
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protoco… Martin Thomson
- RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protoco… Makaraju, Maridi Raju (Raju)
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protoco… Julian Reschke