Re: Port 80 deprecation

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Thu, 03 June 2021 02:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3DA3A24E8 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 19:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GUdFGnhDAW5I for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 19:21:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 738093A24E7 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 19:21:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1locuc-0006cn-Iw for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 02:16:52 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 02:16:46 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1locuc-0006cn-Iw@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <vixie@redbarn.org>) id 1loctw-0006Y8-MT for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 02:16:13 +0000
Received: from family.redbarn.org ([24.104.150.213]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <vixie@redbarn.org>) id 1loctn-0007mz-Tq for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 02:16:01 +0000
Received: by family.redbarn.org (Postfix, from userid 716) id A85AD7599B; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 02:15:42 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 02:15:42 +0000
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20210603021542.wjwkk7kq4axoterj@family.redbarn.org>
References: <41fb81f5-4978-f8da-d0de-7af26cd20e74@gmail.com> <em31279999-b222-49d5-8243-8ec47f667f6e@bombadil>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <em31279999-b222-49d5-8243-8ec47f667f6e@bombadil>
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=24.104.150.213; envelope-from=vixie@redbarn.org; helo=family.redbarn.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1loctn-0007mz-Tq 1928fed1fb6ce98c761ac9117d7e9df4
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Port 80 deprecation
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/20210603021542.wjwkk7kq4axoterj@family.redbarn.org>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/38840
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 12:23:08AM +0000, Adrien de Croy wrote:
> 
> Let's not get ahead of ourselves.
> 
> Port 80 is still heavily used.
> 
> Suggest revisiting this idea in maybe 50 years.

TCP/80 will remain in use for vm-internal and hypervisor-scale API's
for much longer than 50 years. it's nice that we have a null-crypto
option on TCP/443 now, but negotiating that across shared silicon when
the endpoints all share a von neumann domain is complexity we would
never be grateful for. it may also have a long life on disconnected
LANs.

so, +2.

-- 
Paul Vixie