Re: http/2 initial limits - i see flow control initial limits specified, but not stream limits

James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Fri, 03 May 2013 17:49 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA08321F96D3 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 May 2013 10:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.150, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wgh1JgvuaEC2 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 May 2013 10:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F03D21F96F9 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 3 May 2013 10:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UYK6C-0005Jm-Nq for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 17:48:48 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 17:48:48 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UYK6C-0005Jm-Nq@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jasnell@gmail.com>) id 1UYK63-0005Gj-CR for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 17:48:39 +0000
Received: from mail-oa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.219.51]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jasnell@gmail.com>) id 1UYK62-00011y-PP for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 17:48:39 +0000
Received: by mail-oa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id g12so1905709oah.38 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 03 May 2013 10:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gxzvaSgWgKGC7Q2cutL9Egjd/17uvdFwSLih+e5Yh3s=; b=Ttt3h+Ln4ZQxPObmOz712zBmKqePZSSYpBYowGbj8S0qCczBZN30/hvW4ko5ZWNF/V ivWBenUpJizzjfqYZ/k3nlubGnf8gvg+Q89EP3Kt+QyvEpXZMgu8dnuOVaOGkPYB+ueG bvztMEVDn0mW0+u+z4K2VaTwWBY/+l2PtzWngwH0YRZyfv9A7YqOUDZjfOxY2+SdjHF+ r2/CZmtRp9A29nYmJOqccL8/U5rJAk2dIsJJCORAyCjl5QY5xzJ6aU/B0+u+YDKb4eGL YlnRTrCqsnuAJ3kat2HcgUrsvm+LbvNOs+YOxF8Coj3UrQzKJ3XOsMUPzcr8KluD7qvV xMlg==
X-Received: by 10.60.47.84 with SMTP id b20mr3145359oen.135.1367603292940; Fri, 03 May 2013 10:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.3.137 with HTTP; Fri, 3 May 2013 10:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAA4WUYjnMupHPL8i13qzNTYr4dDjc_-ygZABaM1C6c8zUuMGJQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA4WUYjnMupHPL8i13qzNTYr4dDjc_-ygZABaM1C6c8zUuMGJQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 10:47:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CABP7RbfxGehBXw+114wyaKJaTQV1rLqCiZXq6KERWbO_HRRpBg@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?B?V2lsbGlhbSBDaGFuICjpmYjmmbrmmIwp?= <willchan@chromium.org>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.219.51; envelope-from=jasnell@gmail.com; helo=mail-oa0-f51.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.701, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UYK62-00011y-PP 27836b5f37718d51fa8e2fbe37c90f35
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: http/2 initial limits - i see flow control initial limits specified, but not stream limits
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABP7RbfxGehBXw+114wyaKJaTQV1rLqCiZXq6KERWbO_HRRpBg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17804
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Which limits specifically? SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS is still
there. Are there others you're concerned about?

On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:37 AM, William Chan (陈智昌)
<willchan@chromium.org>; wrote:
> Did the stream limits disappear by accident?