Editorial Issue: Unknown/Undefined Settings IDs
James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Fri, 26 April 2013 20:49 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7448221F979E for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.308
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.308 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.291, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4qm+RvBEoHGU for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C445421F96AC for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UVpZX-00012p-3T for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:48:47 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:48:47 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UVpZX-00012p-3T@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jasnell@gmail.com>) id 1UVpZT-000124-3d for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:48:43 +0000
Received: from mail-oa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.219.44]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jasnell@gmail.com>) id 1UVpZS-0000VL-ID for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:48:43 +0000
Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id h1so4420019oag.17 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=tcshdTBRuRXaLM1Gsyf51fA8KoFfTcCQs7IeEwXcbNg=; b=vPXstyxsuB4Gqu76k/D0ghrGVu47ODLT7UqpNjonjm6c/bMDSAo9CzMNIXUx+i/EBO htnXVp7Vmw+ocZaLO2Q5SP7D3A22iLVLIxUpxVUzV7YKmdcgopPe/zz1MrMhLHWwP+++ z487/xy1656z4RPNb2vi6YO1TUtjym29uZ19uV+p6bp/6NNnpO4KWahQpw8nSHaNFV9d h86xo7fKfZ0YfZw7hPvZ/YOapD4kiMd8CQ/3swcF8gDRKSshdWQw6UwtKrilMZa3dTZX pD2e9tmuHJha3FEovSrle805Nd3+7rs4uQuBqo0e8jah1lYpfhSUsE1v+KU7HSNPNFDb fsSg==
X-Received: by 10.60.92.41 with SMTP id cj9mr18999895oeb.31.1367009296609; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.3.137 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:47:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CABP7RbfeRy=VtKPZwQ2rVOOcB=_ARwGw_NCvQPZUAKMqWUiGKA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.219.44; envelope-from=jasnell@gmail.com; helo=mail-oa0-f44.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.627, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1UVpZS-0000VL-ID a3bdf14ec8a6c6b030f9ba6c4082b0a3
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Editorial Issue: Unknown/Undefined Settings IDs
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABP7RbfeRy=VtKPZwQ2rVOOcB=_ARwGw_NCvQPZUAKMqWUiGKA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17622
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
We currently define Settings as being extensible but we do not define, as far as I can tell, what should happen if a Settings ID is not known or recognized by an endpoint. We could define it as MUST IGNORE but that could be dangerous depending on what the new setting is being used for.
- Re: Editorial Issue: Unknown/Undefined Settings I… Martin Thomson
- Editorial Issue: Unknown/Undefined Settings IDs James M Snell
- Re: Editorial Issue: Unknown/Undefined Settings I… James M Snell