IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Push and Caching

Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> Fri, 22 August 2014 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 980E61A06E4 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.57
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.57 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69-SWdRptj77 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2F971A06E6 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:33:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XKsg7-0002zp-6f for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:31:07 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:31:07 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XKsg7-0002zp-6f@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>) id 1XKsfl-0002yk-46 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:30:45 +0000
Received: from mail-bn1blp0185.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([207.46.163.185] helo=na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>) id 1XKsff-0005fE-Bk for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:30:45 +0000
Received: from BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.230.24) by BL2PR03MB130.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.230.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1010.18; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:30:05 +0000
Received: from BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.9.11]) by BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.9.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1010.016; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:30:05 +0000
From: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, William Chow <wchow@mobolize.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Thread-Topic: Push and Caching
Thread-Index: Ac+7v7yD0ZTj4Oj/Q2KCGy9THej6JgAEtB4AABO1Y4AAWKDXwAAA/BiwAAXBIYAAAme3gAAhH1uAAAA6DAA=
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:30:05 +0000
Message-ID: <40d03e3bb1df480e808e64fa29048880@BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <dc3d860ecb4b4d408a5ed0519a036e61@BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CABkgnnWvKgyDcm-1jEKZUA2Qza9M46X+X_QybwuqRwvSUrTjNw@mail.gmail.com> <B6B89855-237F-44DA-B29C-2A3BB5CE0EED@mnot.net> <920b92b90a3c47ef8d450c903b83af40@DM2PR05MB670.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <d94a3acceb954583a61b0118381df417@BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAOdDvNpa5WR4LJbsgQaBE3bTSAc+gXfYqCmV+zmUzE5b7+1a9A@mail.gmail.com> <CECA0C1A-E64C-443A-87AF-22BC66286F72@mnot.net> <CABkgnnXVJA3R4qhc__k4j+_LzeS7B24VxfCZwBSfywepEx=tKA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXVJA3R4qhc__k4j+_LzeS7B24VxfCZwBSfywepEx=tKA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8:ee31::3]
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;UriScan:;
x-forefront-prvs: 0311124FA9
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(6009001)(13464003)(377454003)(189002)(199003)(24454002)(79102001)(81542001)(74316001)(15975445006)(31966008)(99396002)(105586002)(20776003)(33646002)(86362001)(2656002)(77982001)(81342001)(74662001)(92566001)(90102001)(74502001)(80022001)(21056001)(46102001)(99286002)(85306004)(76576001)(4396001)(106356001)(87936001)(83322001)(107046002)(54356999)(101416001)(77096002)(83072002)(50986999)(93886004)(19580395003)(76482001)(76176999)(95666004)(108616004)(86612001)(85852003)(64706001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BL2PR03MB130; H:BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=207.46.163.185; envelope-from=Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com; helo=na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.110, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1XKsff-0005fE-Bk f5f86865a4ecf45d96baf45876df0ed8
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: Push and Caching
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/40d03e3bb1df480e808e64fa29048880@BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/26707
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

"While the stream identified by the promised stream ID is still open" - meaning that as long as the client has asked for it before the server has finished sending it?  That's a fairly small amount of time, particularly if the resource is very small, but sounds like a good starting point.

If nothing else, that's a clearer standard that a proxy can use in the absence of knowledge of the client's request groupings.

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 10:18 AM
To: Mark Nottingham
Cc: Patrick McManus; Mike Bishop; William Chow; HTTP Working Group
Subject: Re: Push and Caching

On 21 August 2014 18:29, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>   https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/pull/598

I like this.  I'm going to leave it to sit for a while and then pull it in.

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status