IETF Logo Mail Archive

Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary)

Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 30 May 2021 08:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 281123A343F for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 May 2021 01:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.747
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.747 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=I94AKxYI; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=fSA8utVq
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jlKUOVM5KXc6 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 May 2021 01:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E4C13A343D for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 30 May 2021 01:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1lnGmi-00007o-5H for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 30 May 2021 08:27:00 +0000
Resent-Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 08:27:00 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1lnGmi-00007o-5H@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <do_not_reply@mnot.net>) id 1lnGmU-00006H-C2 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 30 May 2021 08:26:46 +0000
Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <do_not_reply@mnot.net>) id 1lnGmQ-0004SG-Ax for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 30 May 2021 08:26:45 +0000
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69EB9DF6 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 30 May 2021 04:26:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 30 May 2021 04:26:28 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject; s=fm2; bh=5IA71jFNwQG uavM125aiGE5OqOMiNrIHoEZJqSCx3RU=; b=I94AKxYIKUhJAtKevlrARCdI8aL VkDmCoZOUFUxZjtPbLk2Fk16CW4K/Gf/XaCi2P4BIS8s0ZURYIaj+G/XYyoJtbqT wTUJNujhB0zafNuX6tfstD6yFbxP6MyoZJPQ9OCCUhL+qSKKStHFBhWX4yKus8eQ q9vCGVtUE3A71v339hDU5ag+5AeEYuAFqSJwOiknWlkWVwsV3PsFIPZJ+I8mySUc +c4e/HA+cL+Bzm1IghNi2ey+YNjsuHrSoOSICOqm+PNhAqGkSlFGfA/MMr4OzuiU YblmvzvQ03P8axJ5x4VfNMJlX7nEzWHGDx02bWiVnH3lgrQUAzdWjcZR3hQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:from:mime-version:subject:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; bh=5IA71jFNwQGuavM125aiGE5OqOMiNrIHoEZJqSCx3RU=; b=fSA8utVq F+UZMm2hM6bjFZ3ewfTvJJm16s90Tq6gu+CwGoGxpjV3njgCXSzTIj6LvytzN0du 2DT1PWCQpNjg0d0mcXN0KY/MnaJQYVMmy583JNYJNSvt0J/T70VfSQGPguFrUdFZ TfYqttGt/W+pi90q/ZvmudwOHDxKR6f4rjGP7n2XZW8sMZ++hHXjkYkOaGDMLsKg 7yUDxr81e2zXZetiw3Ux1Rr0M1hCB/Zob60VwrAqqzw0+//ISbJkq8oekxuYJ1y6 SnT9PdMNvQ8MuLkudQJUNSY5Dlo3rEmm3NLEje+kXtKd729Xjq/sHmXZ56raKVGP 7bS1gBJ5EBEhUw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:MkyzYI0YT3vyKbHW1HJ1jFYbx6RU2ocDgt1HOQwWvtD-YLlqkMFQFg> <xme:MkyzYDE-rsBKHV8FYAdBXNInlr-GaGkBPrKr9wyvAVr6P7V99kFHD6dhpOLD5XfQx 9J1OZLeI3o3jmEJ9w>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdeluddgtdegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucfpohcuuggrthgvuchfihgvlhguucdlgeelmdenuc fjughrpegtggfhvffusegrtddtredttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeftvghpohhsihhtohhrhicu tegtthhivhhithihucfuuhhmmhgrrhihuceuohhtuceoughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihse hmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeefvdduteejvdefkeehieevuefg fefhteetveegffekffefteffvdelheduieetnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtg homhenucfkphepudefrdekvddrkeefrddvvdeknecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptden ucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnh gvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:MkyzYA7ZnGAFXPISz5R1YGqdwAazZvmtnpTFCDLJKKeTCc9-h_vXdg> <xmx:MkyzYB1rlo8RRaSceX6aRZcq2xK3SULeovfpTHqCpxp7m67bIm92rQ> <xmx:MkyzYLFtR2jY1uN0GwxoQd_LxJ06LQr31I5mptenAcCyv-DTvyNOjA> <xmx:NEyzYBPdcogsvE68upcWp1b0IDgLXbTO39Fndv4jvQRCvfyfEXdoVg>
Received: from fv-az201-811.ett4tu3jvdse5ovc2mkgjqcs5a.bx.internal.cloudapp.net (unknown [13.82.83.228]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sun, 30 May 2021 04:26:26 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============0448398789765487684=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.24; envelope-from=do_not_reply@mnot.net; helo=wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=do_not_reply@mnot.net domain=mnot.net), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=do_not_reply@mnot.net domain=messagingengine.com), signature is good
Message-ID: <E1lnGmQ-0004SG-Ax@titan.w3.org>
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MISSING_DATE=1.36, MISSING_MID=0.497, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1lnGmQ-0004SG-Ax 39226ff088ac9c7f0d3451071296cd3e
Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 08:26:46 +0000
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Weekly github digest (HTTP Activity Summary)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/E1lnGmQ-0004SG-Ax@titan.w3.org>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/38828
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>



Events without label "editorial"

Issues
------
* httpwg/http-core (+1/-1/💬7)
  1 issues created:
  - What is the correct behavior if HTTP/2.0 is mentioned over HTTP/1.1 syntax? (by reschke)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/845 

  1 issues received 7 new comments:
  - #845 What is the correct behavior if HTTP/2.0 is mentioned over HTTP/1.1 syntax? (7 by RajeevaLochana, annevk, kazuho, reschke, royfielding)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/845 [h1-messaging] [semantics] 

  1 issues closed:
  - Security considerations: `_` in field names https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/843 [has-proposal] [semantics] 

* httpwg/http-extensions (+5/-6/💬4)
  5 issues created:
  - Support for Raw Public Keys (by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1522 [client-cert-header] 
  - Certificate chain data (by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1521 
  - IANA registration (by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1520 [client-cert-header] 
  - Renegotiation and Client-Cert (by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1519 [client-cert-header] 
  - RFC 6265bis should specify that no decoding of Set-Cookie line should occur (by chlily1)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1517 [6265bis] 

  4 issues received 4 new comments:
  - #1514 Signing HTTP Signatures Section 2.3 Question Concerning Lists (1 by jricher)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1514 [signatures] 
  - #1426 RFC6265bis Section 9.3 link broken (1 by chlily1)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1426 [6265bis] 
  - #1422 RFC6265bis Spec does not match Lax-Allowing-Unsafe behavior implemented in Chrome and Firefox (1 by chlily1)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1422 [6265bis] 
  - #970 Computing Digest in requests (1 by LPardue)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/970 [digest-headers] 

  6 issues closed:
  - RFC6265bis Section 9.3 link broken https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1426 [6265bis] 
  - [WIP] Review security considerations https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1486 [digest-headers] 
  - Add section Changes from RFC3230' https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1484 [digest-headers] 
  - Fix trailer section  https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1487 [digest-headers] 
  - Remove FAQ from digest https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1489 [digest-headers] 
  - RFC6265bis Spec does not match Lax-Allowing-Unsafe behavior implemented in Chrome and Firefox https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1422 [6265bis] 

* httpwg/http2-spec (+1/-5/💬2)
  1 issues created:
  - Intermediaries and connection-specific headers (by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/issues/851 

  2 issues received 2 new comments:
  - #849 Is Content-Length acceptable on CONNECT request? (1 by Lukasa)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/issues/849 
  - #826 Tweaking registry policies (1 by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/issues/826 

  5 issues closed:
  - Consider loosening requirement for clients to reject connection-specific header fields https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/issues/789 
  - Any appropriate error code, including generic ones https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/issues/824 
  - Remove upgrade mechanism https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/issues/772 
  - Consider (partial) removal of priority signaling https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/issues/773 
  - Tweak HTTP/1.1 dependencies https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/issues/841 



Pull requests
-------------
* httpwg/http-core (+0/-1/💬5)
  1 pull requests received 5 new comments:
  - #844 Application handling of field names (5 by reschke, royfielding)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/pull/844 

  1 pull requests merged:
  - Application handling of field names
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/pull/844 

* httpwg/http-extensions (+3/-9/💬3)
  3 pull requests submitted:
  - safe-method-w-body: update HTTP reference (#1524) (by reschke)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1525 
  - Remove TODOs (by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1523 [client-cert-header] 
  - First pass for header/field terminology (by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1518 [client-cert-header] 

  2 pull requests received 3 new comments:
  - #1485 Fix: #1484. Add section Changes from 3230 (1 by LPardue)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1485 [digest-headers] 
  - #1378 Fix: #1377. Deprecate unixsum and unixcksum. (2 by LPardue, ioggstream)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1378 [digest-headers] 

  9 pull requests merged:
  - Clarified the ways cookies may be ignored.
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1013 [6265bis] 
  - safe-method-w-body: update HTTP reference (#1524)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1525 
  - 6265bis: Clarify IANA registry wording
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1516 
  - Fix: #1486. Security considerations review.
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1488 [digest-headers] 
  - Fix: #1484. Add section Changes from 3230
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1485 [digest-headers] 
  - Fix: #1487. Trailers considerations.
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1491 [digest-headers] 
  - Mark's review on section 3.
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1479 [digest-headers] 
  - Fix: #1489. FAQ to be removed.
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1490 [digest-headers] 
  - digest: editorial over abstract and intro
    https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/1477 [digest-headers] 

* httpwg/http2-spec (+7/-8/💬31)
  7 pull requests submitted:
  - Discuss flow control performance (by Lukasa)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/859 
  - Add details regarding removal of connection-specific fields. (by Lukasa)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/858 
  - Copy the QUIC text regarding generic errors (by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/856 
  - Remove dead references (by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/855 
  - Add a changelog for priority removal (by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/854 
  - Experimental begone (by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/853 
  - Clean closed state (by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/850 

  4 pull requests received 31 new comments:
  - #859 Discuss flow control performance (9 by Lukasa, wtarreau)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/859 
  - #850 Clean closed state (11 by Lukasa, martinthomson, wtarreau)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/850 
  - #846 What characters are permitted (10 by Lukasa, gregw, martinthomson, reschke)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/846 
  - #820 Remove Upgrade mechanism. (1 by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/820 

  8 pull requests merged:
  - Add details regarding removal of connection-specific fields.
    https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/858 
  - Add a changelog for priority removal
    https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/854 
  - Remove dead references
    https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/855 
  - Copy the QUIC text regarding generic errors
    https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/856 
  - Partially-valid request/response handling
    https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/847 
  - Remove Upgrade mechanism.
    https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/820 
  - Remove priority
    https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/795 
  - Make HTTP/1.1 reference informational
    https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec/pull/845 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/httpwg/http-core
* https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions
* https://github.com/httpwg/http2-spec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email