RE: H2 Implementation Debug State URI

Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> Wed, 10 August 2016 17:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC4C812D82C for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:45:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.268
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.268 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qedfumJxOoXS for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:45:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BB1412D7FC for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:45:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1bXXUa-0007wi-AO for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:40:36 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:40:36 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1bXXUa-0007wi-AO@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>) id 1bXXUS-0007uW-Hy for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:40:28 +0000
Received: from mail-by2nam01on0129.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.34.129] helo=NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>) id 1bXXUQ-0001GC-LL for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:40:28 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=FxY9MoqbqI9RoMpyHEUn+3lNFIYDCwZxntJsrIIRJKo=; b=Y3xsGBtOSuxRmrHcCsqHOXgZg89h0RjBPFZRtqwH4ZXugoi6VuEbbSR4LOkVUXZEMZq2cRj+/420Gjtz6qbD9OJOyh4fBkMyJNdRgo8+E25HVn7EkMz3Rl4nJ8Gkg6iak2lMCb5GlQ2lCIb79aOLnIaqflYz2JjbVvVNUQdL6wI=
Received: from BLUPR03MB1330.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.163.80.20) by BLUPR03MB1330.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.163.80.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.549.15; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:39:57 +0000
Received: from BLUPR03MB1330.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.80.20]) by BLUPR03MB1330.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.80.20]) with mapi id 15.01.0549.025; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:39:57 +0000
From: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
To: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>, Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Thread-Topic: H2 Implementation Debug State URI
Thread-Index: AQHR6M3QAyIqT/4FKUiQmigswhstsaA6DaQAgAASaICAAHNVAIABm36AgANaQoCAAOwwAIAAZv6AgAEragCAAGvNAIAAFuWA
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:39:57 +0000
Message-ID: <BLUPR03MB1330A0CB3BE3F4EB2A918F8D871D0@BLUPR03MB1330.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <63CCB07A-0204-4CF7-B598-9497D7112021@lukasa.co.uk> <4314.1470384112@critter.freebsd.dk> <B4171FD2-B154-4950-BF0C-4B5A4714367F@lukasa.co.uk> <57A4B820.9060300@measurement-factory.com> <44E9A3E7-C2CC-46EE-B198-A2E85273B032@lukasa.co.uk> <5221cf24-e49d-9748-d13c-abe02406beac@measurement-factory.com> <4CC78A66-5617-46D0-AC91-6D2FB7E39332@lukasa.co.uk> <103e0083-1046-f429-a1d1-0d0b384ede60@measurement-factory.com> <418145C6-B3DE-4EC8-A069-03A3F210CAF2@lukasa.co.uk> <a4c30959-daff-9395-0be3-07d44249be73@measurement-factory.com>
In-Reply-To: <a4c30959-daff-9395-0be3-07d44249be73@measurement-factory.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8:2::390]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 50ef6c1a-e6e3-4077-e2fb-08d3c14558c9
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR03MB1330; 6:6IY2dKlOb1JsSoZt2u8T2ZyAq1RPTS3R8EZrFpTfGnPTpoKjUThEpf/OUFiKzGbhxmf45fJUuNkhakai/6/Ia5liWUZ+gll29IF4bjQnkKJN5Nv8iYZJAmdOaLYbw9BaIX3M9yuCK5werSyp+rgG5z5z1rEDwVWATmBAL7HM0qtKJKXH6CadvBZ6RHjQK3vCiZnNR6Q97MS5Ytfn2g9vL6m5VosFA0K7z03vn4G8zH8FXNyv5tzKvwMKtOwavyeGv/pKYYwjOMwG2/EayfdE8AtZ2NnQ7b+cE1J508/jKslxdqHbSWuK86ZoE9qtXAOmluELbUSmbqzW9/KqMwyZqw==; 5:kb35oydb6RQJ+EYn/Cfhjf/WCzVPEca3HcXzTklnLNyWsg7gEaRb59w7hKlayRTa4p8h1I6ihNTHVU4PKDMlbPU/jpfOuD2dA0oExlCwANzPLlclggrQAhXosS0nSm6hsI/Ah7mhBTdq//OnaVCZNA==; 24:CxBDkz585FSj8GtT+IfZZxTCAOsL+bBJNGwUwamQTbq85xyHy/ulnVAZdHUuuyfQn+LD6hExFbuB4z+rJbG0wlPTsaFmAMa5Up8Z8wIrR+g=; 7:2p78OBiGUdkPeOw8jVBeFq95fQsSX5UWNgn/qIsu3rkQ7FXPuhrrzsakvvnai03B9Sjn5ZbQo8/EHo7UFYu4pfbBUyMewDUVV14UPGUQNK3B422yoOpU1dgACZpoZRaZScLedf7Sx0S5MaA+v3achrXs9x2nXKXMgRB66FtoqGokzxMU0ejQTgK+uXnOnov19S6aeVYVt3sfxnG3pOYsQDLFhZcvhv4OsV8nn0Ezp6xJCEF0vfARS06wSjDw1c5J
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR03MB1330;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR03MB1330388EADE7665098F19296871D0@BLUPR03MB1330.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(6040166)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:BLUPR03MB1330; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR03MB1330;
x-forefront-prvs: 0030839EEE
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(377454003)(189002)(199003)(13464003)(24454002)(77096005)(81166006)(189998001)(6116002)(76576001)(10090500001)(101416001)(5005710100001)(86362001)(93886004)(586003)(11100500001)(2900100001)(76176999)(2950100001)(10400500002)(81156014)(10290500002)(50986999)(19580405001)(54356999)(87936001)(102836003)(33656002)(8990500004)(68736007)(74316002)(2906002)(122556002)(8936002)(92566002)(106116001)(19580395003)(305945005)(7846002)(7696003)(7736002)(105586002)(5002640100001)(99286002)(106356001)(4326007)(8676002)(97736004)(3280700002)(9686002)(86612001)(3660700001)(5001770100001)(3826002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR03MB1330; H:BLUPR03MB1330.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 10 Aug 2016 17:39:57.3980 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR03MB1330
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=104.47.34.129; envelope-from=Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com; helo=NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.453, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_NW=0.5
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1bXXUQ-0001GC-LL abef7b283def8825692a56dc94829a70
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: H2 Implementation Debug State URI
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/BLUPR03MB1330A0CB3BE3F4EB2A918F8D871D0@BLUPR03MB1330.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32247
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

The problem is that upstream HPACK context might well contain headers from requests that were made by clients other than you.  Leakage between connections is a bad thing.  You might be able to turn this on for in-depth debugging, but you'd *never* want that bit enabled on a live server.

-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Rousskov [mailto:rousskov@measurement-factory.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 9:17 AM
To: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: H2 Implementation Debug State URI

On 08/10/2016 03:50 AM, Cory Benfield wrote:

> using Max-Forwards is conditional on not dumping HPACK. That may be an 
> acceptable compromise.

What is wrong with receiving HPACK state from hop #(N+1) that has allowed its HPACK state sharing, even if you actually asked to see HPACK state of the unsupporting hop #N? I understand that #(N+1) may not be very useful in some triage cases, but I am sure it will be useful in others.

The Via headers and/or equivalent will tell the client which hop responded to the Max-Forwards:N debugging request (and, in most cases, whether any unsupporting hops were skipped).

Alex.