IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Questions about stream state transitions

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 18 July 2013 16:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C1921F9D62 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.575
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.575 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o5FR6vstV3kF for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F05611E8192 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UzrBg-0000WH-2S for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:36:16 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:36:16 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UzrBg-0000WH-2S@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1UzrBX-0000VE-98 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:36:07 +0000
Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1UzrBW-0000dm-I1 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:36:07 +0000
Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id hj3so6877632wib.10 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=k4aAH5W383VxVWrhR+vLpgzX0cLL/oNzel1yqADIRiE=; b=EwK/4SFMbw5gx9JwSOZrkAx3yN1FeU9SYd+0+nU7aU/nFO6venOvUEAGEOCxOL3sNG gibAI0fhaM22xWLVR6QP+pNrQYG6tR5I/8He7t53/kcarHXo76I9zSu8LTjQ0dFaxPjC 4QiXpI0/Oenz9w77kyFqNhCFoxOAl/fZXkdwwOU/02YBG/JvhBOgmGeNtCuS7HC4q9e7 I1pOBmGgHZ4QsD/DV+tDoYvxkuXPTwwDMVeLz6tPF/lYk2IrjiN6TRkjMS6m/pgf8FZD KYN9RWwjuhB/LWdlCMPpHE/5r75t4EkuptCOye+BmVxLTwWbmqR7CbdLHsEjWxdShJvj EXKg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.110.6 with SMTP id hw6mr9358258wjb.3.1374165340479; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.60.46 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51E7A83A.2050209@iij.ad.jp>
References: <51E6908F.2010602@iij.ad.jp> <CABkgnnVRuSRwr+3RQd=5+nMcz5Mhy3mavSXc15wi_0ZFd5yo8g@mail.gmail.com> <51E78D77.7060000@iij.ad.jp> <20130718080838.GA880@LK-Perkele-VII> <51E7A83A.2050209@iij.ad.jp>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:35:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnX2WGn4xi3Gf2t=N4BUtPBi1u040tiUmDiPyc8+46n+Ww@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Shigeki Ohtsu <ohtsu@iij.ad.jp>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.212.171; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-wi0-f171.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.700, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1UzrBW-0000dm-I1 cce6d3b2b280673095879097240ff05e
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Questions about stream state transitions
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnX2WGn4xi3Gf2t=N4BUtPBi1u040tiUmDiPyc8+46n+Ww@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18844
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 18 July 2013 01:32, Shigeki Ohtsu <ohtsu@iij.ad.jp> wrote:
>> Eh, HEADERS in Reserved (remote) transitions to half closed (local)
>> regardless of END_STREAM? That looks bit suspicious.
>
>
> Yes, it can be an option that it is UNCHANGED to still remain in the
> reserved(remote)
> when HEADERS without END_STREAM is received.

It should be that HEADERS + END_STREAM from reserved (remote) goes to
closed.  This covers the case where a push only includes headers (a
push for a HEAD request might look like that).

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email