IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: h2 implementation list -- PLEASE UPDATE

Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> Thu, 02 April 2015 02:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE5D1AD35E for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 19:56:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.289
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.289 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nHcR35Lc-PUi for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 19:56:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7538E1A00F4 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 19:56:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1YdVGN-0005B3-6B for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 02:53:47 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 02:53:47 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1YdVGN-0005B3-6B@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <gregw@intalio.com>) id 1YdVGJ-00059k-GH for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 02:53:43 +0000
Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com ([209.85.217.172]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <gregw@intalio.com>) id 1YdVGH-0006YV-VT for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 02:53:43 +0000
Received: by lbdc10 with SMTP id c10so49839500lbd.2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 19:53:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=N0dvKd7UqpKejhnLJM0qHUID2tQoLlPWlaLSHcY+plg=; b=nHb2FKTgHefQ0NLcvCubzSymR1N5R9hNoxJ67GD21GWfEBnqVO304Ww1BWtJLR+Ay3 coDmx3MD2IKyPPY3HPskPkpZ51HBjPazonHwfXr055m0q7BU8KGoJA3dFIA13gPPTVRf B8oIfgSOlxED9SozDeSYP0YksijF5hvSuRoVqMVvLGZIKr7FGqXjkpJ6/JjAzlbASMcc vVB4921vv4BAhSQVOL0vJxdSxjEQSK1fErfcoyQG+kgZb9do09boANQaeiQ1wFKu47Pp r1tpMW4aMB87Bk2wrGDmGQ+brFwHB4ch0peDRamd3CyFdzoZqqPatrIReADIRee+gG7s t5sA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlB24RNRHTCceSNIM0koD/ZDisZydni5C++jN5GzljWxb+nmNHHzFK0xrNK5K47AVeomMO6
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.1.194 with SMTP id 2mr38586564lao.38.1427943195016; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 19:53:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.175.43 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 19:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <21C94472-23EE-4133-B4B5-7F772490E432@mnot.net>
References: <4AC59768-2519-4B95-86F3-43C19B4329E7@mnot.net> <D24E0668-56B7-4457-8E7C-DF7623AEF77B@mnot.net> <CABb0SYS+kTiCKHQUWfnVWV-DKfY6TVWm81UT1BE7xHAtg42E7g@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXmtyt+r8Q-cJp2M+e8jnBc888pDXs6kd7N6bE-E1b2WQ@mail.gmail.com> <21C94472-23EE-4133-B4B5-7F772490E432@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 13:53:14 +1100
Message-ID: <CAH_y2NEwNWkJzuO4PtVGEsUko5H8s=tWpT-1Xib7ZzaejO0kfw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Max Bruce <max.bruce12@gmail.com>, HTTP <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013c6bcce615ce0512b4ee42"
Received-SPF: permerror client-ip=209.85.217.172; envelope-from=gregw@intalio.com; helo=mail-lb0-f172.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.925, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1YdVGH-0006YV-VT 3fd7130ed42f7c1d36574630373ea42a
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: h2 implementation list -- PLEASE UPDATE
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAH_y2NEwNWkJzuO4PtVGEsUko5H8s=tWpT-1Xib7ZzaejO0kfw@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29211
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Mark,

Do we also list h2c and h2c-14 etc. ?

Also, I couldn't help my OC self and sorted the table.

cheers




On 2 April 2015 at 13:26, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> Right.
>
> The most common values will be “h2” and “h2-14” (because 14 is the last
> implementation draft we nominated, and is what most implementations use
> today AFAICT).
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> > On 2 Apr 2015, at 1:15 pm, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 1 April 2015 at 18:58, Max Bruce <max.bruce12@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Is draft 17 the final? I never found an actual finalized RFC.
> >
> > The RFC editor is working on -17.  There will be no technical changes
> > between that and the final document.
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>


-- 
Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>  @  Webtide - *an Intalio subsidiary*
http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales
http://www.webtide.com  advice and support for jetty and cometd.

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status