Re: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43)

Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> Wed, 04 January 2012 05:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F3A21F85AD for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 21:13:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.209
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.209 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.190, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_17=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_48=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZHFL36QoTpLu for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 21:13:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1439F21F85AC for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 21:13:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1RiJA4-0002Sq-LB for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 05:13:16 +0000
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1RiJ9y-0002Ru-9s for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 05:13:10 +0000
Received: from ip-58-28-153-233.static-xdsl.xnet.co.nz ([58.28.153.233] helo=treenet.co.nz) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1RiJ9u-0004hn-OA for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 05:13:08 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (unknown [119.224.36.238]) by treenet.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B66E6E76 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:12:10 +1300 (NZDT)
Message-ID: <4F03DFA6.3070002@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 18:12:06 +1300
From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <6A53E99A-019D-4F6D-A33D-24524CD34E17@mnot.net> <4EFDFA17.4080804@gmx.de> <4F031419.1050708@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <4F031419.1050708@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: permerror client-ip=58.28.153.233; envelope-from=squid3@treenet.co.nz; helo=treenet.co.nz
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1RiJ9u-0004hn-OA 8fe0f4b3767457aa834b892cb880f455
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43)
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/4F03DFA6.3070002@treenet.co.nz>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/11964
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Resent-Message-Id: <E1RiJA4-0002Sq-LB@frink.w3.org>
Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 05:13:16 +0000

On 4/01/2012 3:43 a.m., Julian Reschke wrote:
>
> "Almost", because it doesn't use Base.fragment when R.frament is 
> undefined.
>
> a) Should we try describe the algorithm based on RFC 3986 ("do 
> relative resolution as defined by ..., then, if the result doesn't 
> have a fragment, add the one from the Base URI")?

+1 on this.

>
> b) Is this potentially an erratum for RFC 3986?
>

um.

AYJ