Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-16
Olivier Bonaventure via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 10 June 2021 15:31 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6DE3A4431 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 08:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TYTVBzDw2QCs for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 08:31:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 423963A4432 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 08:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1lrMNx-00084S-69 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:14:39 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:14:21 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1lrMNx-00084S-69@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <noreply@ietf.org>) id 1lrMJo-0007AH-Ul for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:10:19 +0000
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <noreply@ietf.org>) id 1lrMJ9-0006v8-Lu for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:10:00 +0000
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7193C3A4384; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 08:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Olivier Bonaventure via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: tsv-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging.all@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.31.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Message-ID: <162333775242.20586.7747298876753631911@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Olivier Bonaventure <Olivier.Bonaventure@uclouvain.be>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 08:09:12 -0700
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=4.31.198.44; envelope-from=noreply@ietf.org; helo=mail.ietf.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1lrMJ9-0006v8-Lu d6e53ef0607e300aaa83fdb6c0141b7c
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-16
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/162333775242.20586.7747298876753631911@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/38881
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Reviewer: Olivier Bonaventure Review result: Ready This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF discussion list for information. When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review. The changes in the parts of the document that could have an impact on the transport are well motivated and do not bring issue for the transport.
- Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-mes… Olivier Bonaventure via Datatracker