Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-16: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 11 June 2021 20:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55CF73A13E9 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 13:08:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qUqwS23xQeOr for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 13:08:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A05AC3A13E7 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 13:08:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1lrnOG-0000dI-6M for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 20:04:31 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 20:04:28 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1lrnOG-0000dI-6M@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <noreply@ietf.org>) id 1lrnN1-0000bT-DO for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 20:03:28 +0000
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <noreply@ietf.org>) id 1lrnML-0007PT-Ud for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 20:03:03 +0000
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F703A13A5; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 13:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging@ietf.org, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, tpauly@apple.com, tpauly@apple.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.32.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Reply-To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <162344173725.11466.14731024533987449235@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 13:02:17 -0700
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=4.31.198.44; envelope-from=noreply@ietf.org; helo=mail.ietf.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO=2.095, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1lrnML-0007PT-Ud b5960dfecff431a5e57b003967a832be
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-16: (with COMMENT)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/162344173725.11466.14731024533987449235@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/38890
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-16: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

(3.3)  "Alternatively, it might be better to redirect the request to a safe
resource that explains how to obtain a new client."

Did you mean "obtain a new user agent?"

(7.1) "recipients MUST anticipate potentially large decimal numerals"

s/decimal/hexidecimal (?) The chunk-size is in hex.

(10) This section could use an introductory paragraph. It is not at all clear
from the text why someone would enclose message as data or in what context this
would occur.