IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: END_FLOW_CONTROL for particular stream interpretation

Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> Wed, 24 July 2013 23:17 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E47021F9A43 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZzzeZEUPZfAi for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:17:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF0B11E812D for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:17:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1V28Im-0001Ju-AI for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 23:17:00 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 23:17:00 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1V28Im-0001Ju-AI@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <patrick.ducksong@gmail.com>) id 1V28Ie-0001JA-1m for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 23:16:52 +0000
Received: from mail-oa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.219.51]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <patrick.ducksong@gmail.com>) id 1V28IZ-0004qJ-DZ for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 23:16:52 +0000
Received: by mail-oa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id i4so2558366oah.38 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=7piVIuwzgTrvYb1ua+XUzsbRlf3Wcdeo6LnFacvPstE=; b=VKJ5WBxG9Mcavmxr7R1XMigt1npZ4UeOjTzrlIigtLklO46yGpyMv+ipevpGNe3uUI +Gk1usRjKHn9E5rDf4orlbYppbo/A2KrBlrwNTI/XUEtcf7fGSAR1r2p0BAYhyON5ziD oNwgPtpMSG0A0Qpgo9J0ufLhEYnxh3m7okSnjlpLWOYI9btvNeKrYJb0dLW16toSvVlq TqvtccdDROe6opwlNG6wal1hjwTA+29qDSjOtB8gvr7/PgbJ2WBGGC74K3gJH20gkUcO Qi3LqUhF6axkQAXpLfCIjvaPaGjPW3fFYr2KjxGsRu8Scwcb0fujSE2d0o4b1AHr2QLp juzw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.134.239 with SMTP id pn15mr38757997oeb.99.1374707781504; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: patrick.ducksong@gmail.com
Received: by 10.76.152.133 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CE15AAC3.1A91%sakulkar@akamai.com>
References: <CE15AAC3.1A91%sakulkar@akamai.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 19:16:21 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: IupzE8a0EBVP67HXQkfPAfTX4rc
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNodWkT5JuKS2vc2L+y4diYCrzwFH_KDejOeUhFBwrQ8Sg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
To: "Kulkarni, Saurabh" <sakulkar@akamai.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b41ce48fc94d904e24a1834"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.219.51; envelope-from=patrick.ducksong@gmail.com; helo=mail-oa0-f51.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.657, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1V28IZ-0004qJ-DZ 5d3adaa198b5add1e7305351c569128c
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: END_FLOW_CONTROL for particular stream interpretation
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAOdDvNodWkT5JuKS2vc2L+y4diYCrzwFH_KDejOeUhFBwrQ8Sg@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18905
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I believe the session window is still in effect as usual.. so normally the
max-send is min(stream-window, session-window) and after the window-update,
at least when sending on stream 2 in your example, it is simply
session-window.


On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Kulkarni, Saurabh <sakulkar@akamai.com>wrote:

> What happens to session level flow control when a WINDOW_UPDATE frame with
> END_FLOW_CONTROL flag set is received with a particular stream id
> (stream_id other than "0")?
>
> E.g.
> Session Window Size: 64kb
> Stream Window Size: 64kb, stream_id: 2
> Receive WINDOW_UPDATE  with END_FLOW_CONTROL bit set, stream_id:2
>
> Should the sender follow the session level flow control or ignore flow
> control for stream_id:2?
>
> - Saurabh
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email