[Technical Errata Reported] RFC7616 (7005)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 23 June 2022 21:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F1DC15A72A for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 14:36:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.661
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.661 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lYx8qkeeHWRt for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 14:36:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org []) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C29D8C15A72B for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 14:36:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1o4URg-0004SB-0n for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 21:33:00 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 21:33:00 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1o4URg-0004SB-0n@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>) id 1o4URe-0004RH-6x for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 21:32:58 +0000
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([] helo=rfcpa.amsl.com) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>) id 1o4URd-003e0f-Dl for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 21:32:57 +0000
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id CD95EAEAB; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 14:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
To: rifaat.ietf@gmail.com, ahrensdc@gmail.com, sophie.bremer@netzkonform.de, rdd@cert.org, paul.wouters@aiven.io, ynir.ietf@gmail.com, rifaat.ietf@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: patrick.ni@redant.ca, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220623213241.CD95EAEAB@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 14:32:41 -0700
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=; envelope-from=wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com; helo=rfcpa.amsl.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1o4URd-003e0f-Dl fc23eba39f160ba3ddc89b2c95d6def4
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7616 (7005)
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/20220623213241.CD95EAEAB@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/40206
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7616,
"HTTP Digest Access Authentication".

You may review the report below and at:

Type: Technical
Reported by: Patrick Ni <patrick.ni@redant.ca>

Section: 3.9.1

Original Text

Corrected Text

[1] In Section 3.4, uri -> The Effective Request URI (Section 5.5 of [RFC7230]) of the HTTP request;

[2] In Section 5.5 of [RFC7230]: The components of the effective request URI, once determined as above, can be combined into absolute-URI form by concatenating the scheme, "://", authority, and combined path and query component

[3] uri="/dir/index.html" is an absolute-path, not an Effective Request URI

This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

RFC7616 (draft-ietf-httpauth-digest-19)
Title               : HTTP Digest Access Authentication
Publication Date    : September 2015
Author(s)           : R. Shekh-Yusef, Ed., D. Ahrens, S. Bremer
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Authentication
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG