IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Interest in a UDP equivalent to the CONNECT method

"Fossati, Thomas (Nokia - GB/Cambridge)" <thomas.fossati@nokia.com> Sun, 04 February 2018 19:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A195D129511 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 11:26:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LOMIgZ-hxqOa for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 11:26:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8920C12895E for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 11:26:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1eiPtX-0002qm-Bs for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 19:24:07 +0000
Resent-Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 19:24:07 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1eiPtX-0002qm-Bs@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <thomas.fossati@nokia.com>) id 1eiPtP-0002pz-2g for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 19:23:59 +0000
Received: from mail-he1eur01on0096.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.0.96] helo=EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <thomas.fossati@nokia.com>) id 1eiPtN-0008Vd-7b for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 19:23:58 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nokia-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=4tQbxANU//7wxS01ce6H9c2i/MM/iLtD5qXNeqmuHsk=; b=R1YK9N/zFpJ6J3mRrpwrxiwcbQU+ajIvTa0bavV9ACpjuZAZPUtG7x3WjGvaYNvhLcgMrCUrWYaZrpCoFcDf8Q4RntkA7F9nikCA5OJrwuJM2H0mlHH3rIJFzkQxPHd/khGKEhF49l3RBlWcqJmDFvvVmJIe0yV9hXRpRJZe/HQ=
Received: from DB3PR07MB0747.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.160.53.12) by DB3PR07MB122.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.147.148) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.485.3; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 19:23:34 +0000
Received: from DB3PR07MB0747.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::92d:a5e9:3083:3dbf]) by DB3PR07MB0747.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::92d:a5e9:3083:3dbf%13]) with mapi id 15.20.0464.015; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 19:23:33 +0000
From: "Fossati, Thomas (Nokia - GB/Cambridge)" <thomas.fossati@nokia.com>
To: Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>
CC: Lucas Pardue <Lucas.Pardue@bbc.co.uk>, "ilariliusvaara@welho.com" <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "Fossati, Thomas (Nokia - GB/Cambridge)" <thomas.fossati@nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: Interest in a UDP equivalent to the CONNECT method
Thread-Index: AdOc9p/RJM+VVNUGQX2RQg/+Gk9/9QADwWgAADABY9AAA5QsgAABexaAAAJduwAAApFwAA==
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 19:23:33 +0000
Message-ID: <4E590E49-9303-4D4E-8D1C-A614876F0C5C@nokia.com>
References: <7CF7F94CB496BF4FAB1676F375F9666A3BACADD6@bgb01xud1012> <20180203154250.GA28930@LK-Perkele-VII> <7CF7F94CB496BF4FAB1676F375F9666A3BACAEC5@bgb01xud1012> <CAHbrMsCTV3OyMNhroSOGBWzH+NhSSDG2Qp4+TpkD2b=kTkV9sg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKcm_gNyqHWu0jEE_Ep+Z_6-FSj-6S6PYqhA3Y_Ma5-gKA7C4A@mail.gmail.com> <CAHbrMsApQQe_p8aNx5bgp0RXBJiG7kiH69MXncZOQ7hLH_sB9w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHbrMsApQQe_p8aNx5bgp0RXBJiG7kiH69MXncZOQ7hLH_sB9w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.9.0.180116
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=thomas.fossati@nokia.com;
x-originating-ip: [88.111.115.17]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DB3PR07MB122; 7:sFFbZJijWJCwNRiokmn5VrVCfx+qXFsVjpH9sJInP2iQmZiJivId8J53bAAwVp0YlzaigePEac/G0GlI6OdfP8jothaA+D2NjxhXHsIwso5mbL5RzTncKAacpvZ64q2v4it1XPC5pNKWK/rGNURebPnfPPUzZ5sgrH+WKOWJMTRGR+k6yRqLAO7qw/fy3T0fgeHobBao1IqfhXeanseUEpPOYaY0l0hsgD0O5V8z8Oe9fKdBB0+NwqI1q/oHnfpm
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;SSOR;
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:SKI; SCL:-1; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(376002)(396003)(39860400002)(39380400002)(366004)(346002)(199004)(189003)(6512007)(8676002)(316002)(81166006)(53936002)(105586002)(478600001)(2906002)(3660700001)(86362001)(3280700002)(6246003)(76176011)(7736002)(305945005)(99286004)(107886003)(5250100002)(36756003)(58126008)(81156014)(110136005)(54906003)(6436002)(8936002)(2900100001)(68736007)(66066001)(83506002)(229853002)(2950100002)(5660300001)(3846002)(6116002)(25786009)(6486002)(4326008)(93886005)(14454004)(102836004)(97736004)(26005)(53546011)(186003)(82746002)(6506007)(83716003)(33656002)(59450400001)(106356001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB3PR07MB122; H:DB3PR07MB0747.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c0a6f9c2-e8e0-48e8-c666-08d56c04c81f
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(48565401081)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(2017052603307)(7193020); SRVR:DB3PR07MB122;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB3PR07MB122:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB3PR07MB1220FF1FE63BAF6DC7D313F80FF0@DB3PR07MB122.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(192374486261705)(211936372134217)(153496737603132)(21532816269658);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040501)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(10201501046)(3231101)(11241501184)(806099)(2400082)(944501161)(6055026)(6041288)(20161123558120)(20161123564045)(20161123560045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562045)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:DB3PR07MB122; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB3PR07MB122;
x-forefront-prvs: 05739BA1B5
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nokia.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: /6IKJUOWBwF4UY+sMemxsJH1nXQz8B3pnMENooSNAjJSuW3sCeYO79xRpGVVTSh+FDNgzZmNAT2cB7qwGLgh+WSsd0C+Ogfknctsgfnwsf+U4MNTJdqttgk9gyxtwoLo
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <89039AA00543C541AD9B3DAB1CC6439B@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nokia.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c0a6f9c2-e8e0-48e8-c666-08d56c04c81f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 Feb 2018 19:23:33.4269 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB3PR07MB122
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-1.164, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1eiPtN-0008Vd-7b ea21925f50e9b48c6d4c12fe1323b08f
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Interest in a UDP equivalent to the CONNECT method
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/4E590E49-9303-4D4E-8D1C-A614876F0C5C@nokia.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/35085
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 04/02/2018, 18:13, "Ben Schwartz" <bemasc@google.com> wrote:
> I see two: HTTP/QUIC and WebRTC.  In both cases, connecting through an
> HTTP proxy currently prevents UDP communication with the destination,
> impairing performance and compatibility.

Not super sure, but another use case that seems to map quite naturally
is the analogue of a TCP proxy (for example, as seen in the mobile
network) with QUIC as the transport, and explicit rather than
implicit/bumped-in-the-wire.

It looks like it'd be possible for an end user to have one security
association to the QUIC transport proxy and a separate one with the
other QUIC end that gets tunnelled through the proxy.

Is my reading correct?

Cheers, thanks

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email