Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 11 October 2016 09:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEEB81294C4 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 02:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.917
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RuPZIjjQda-V for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 02:56:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B33C91294AD for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 02:56:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1bttjH-000098-NN for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:52:11 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:52:11 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1bttjH-000098-NN@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1bttj9-000087-Os for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:52:03 +0000
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) id 1bttit-0008Sn-Ev for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:52:01 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.197] ([5.10.171.186]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0ME33j-1beAwE49kN-00HR82; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 11:51:10 +0200
To: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
References: <147614675047.31404.6416168532325888959.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161011035143.EF7DF13664@welho-filter2.welho.com> <42B9174B-2A49-4E21-B607-E60D05952561@mnot.net> <CAKXHy=f=tNi5mft02y_rhg9tbP8J5wDLSR1=MmJeys+7tUWC0A@mail.gmail.com> <4dbd894c-4389-a246-8a75-16a103f5858e@gmx.de> <CAKXHy=fXPVXJ_-EkjCY2n1MD7-hRoXQb63zsJY8pGruGqe+N2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Kari hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <637ed84c-06c9-5d4c-3c7d-0bf6fff606bc@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 11:51:08 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKXHy=fXPVXJ_-EkjCY2n1MD7-hRoXQb63zsJY8pGruGqe+N2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:lDIheAMJKbGmuOWetG9re7uQbwOTKlrEhdG1RViw26nyEQ2dy3y 8qZYIwccOFsfKTDB/aESwsAoIZicbMyXGUU2zKgJdB/gonk1uvDO4cIu0bapwYNHtfJvpaq yMH1fMHcqkhtOwNJ0fiaen+q4V0It/Cm8tICdm1smQW+2W7KocDxRdSMCCcce4Muhw3rL9F A8tzNBrEK7nJ/T9TF8Arg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:6POmX9PbG3E=:prQQXe6XIF8dQwJFmn6vvR AXzOZKTcolXWL8MD3UdYXAbpV9YTPVzV4IYZFBlLqUKit65uF4A8dvhGyoonvHQ0nC3VQBLcd WfeRZPh+r0zyKZri8Nam/szxtCCwn62CZBS9/SrkBJNm01MnaxcC2cMkTUcpr/E0ecD+WU1Ys J9jXBP7upndNWSowzQYBxwodp1QaxGcdP63C1qzBmF+YyYeTxdFsP0J5XuGqpAKOpZlxLIC1e 0FJBk+2SHCduZWEmlNYb0MgoPQ6ZaGDg32p5ENGK30wGvOO8kOBY3dpfPIyZZ+gsosJa2Yf1P gtIkfxM38SSiHvzuSvh2YEq+SSHvGfzjuOrrZP9DGYIPb1mvOZhmtVWxz9ELm4ekmXhtQpHlO dfRZ4BZ/cYEomSR0P4G0jTBSemiSMKjQAUP3R5Exi0fjCyfpXUDM6kr0fIKX0Mvk3+IyS5JWk yX9Tg7zEhI25trJXamq55cQpuNpxInDdA9yOIM9/SZvAYy5rAwj7IwtafqA2Y24StzYZsCFk5 aY1WAO58rFSHQrP/Top5wEV4kBFMa6s+4/+wOHXcPYAocT8oBnDCzg+ParznM9mbYENlpNALE ac9qFfAapPCqiNkTSmDWDdPdcB2C/ymiONsM7/VRs34f1BYXm95YYK/tffiValOcIqhiJ7yoz xkJXOQIajzJFDRp4bl5vRC1mrFwQyyOKb23OogcTE5XFQExdB4AoSkUICrcwgfUDN1gyXs5AO pX9uCF2O5CJ3l9kfiSvlT2Y8a+gvMYUQboLaGngmd0SwkLHV0DOfDpn3o6Ejr5zdhOS+NS1ee BFOuVGd
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=212.227.17.22; envelope-from=julian.reschke@gmx.de; helo=mout.gmx.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.352, BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1bttit-0008Sn-Ev fc04a2862cb847de3557e1168cad534b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/637ed84c-06c9-5d4c-3c7d-0bf6fff606bc@gmx.de>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32558
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 2016-10-11 11:44, Mike West wrote:
> ...
> I made this change because of a lint warning that the `sane-cookie-date`
> definition in the same block was too long. What's a reasonable way of
> marking both of these up consistently without overflowing the allotted
> width?
> ...

This:

> -sane-cookie-date  = rfc1123-date
> -                      ; defined in [RFC2616], Section 3.3.1
> +sane-cookie-date  =
> +   <rfc1123-date, defined in [RFC2616], Section 3.3.1>

should work.

Best regards, Julian