RE: Interest in a UDP equivalent to the CONNECT method

Lucas Pardue <Lucas.Pardue@bbc.co.uk> Sun, 04 February 2018 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4606C129C59 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 11:56:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9wpfWAQmjsGO for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 11:56:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64186129C56 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 11:56:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1eiQMe-0003nr-OH for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 19:54:12 +0000
Resent-Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 19:54:12 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1eiQMe-0003nr-OH@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <Lucas.Pardue@bbc.co.uk>) id 1eiQMV-0003mX-3s for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 19:54:03 +0000
Received: from mailout0.cwwtf.bbc.co.uk ([132.185.160.179]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <Lucas.Pardue@bbc.co.uk>) id 1eiQMT-0000q0-8m for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 19:54:02 +0000
Received: from BGB01XI1011.national.core.bbc.co.uk (bgb01xi1011.national.core.bbc.co.uk [10.161.14.15]) by mailout0.cwwtf.bbc.co.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w14JrbIQ012127; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 19:53:37 GMT
Received: from BGB01XUD1012.national.core.bbc.co.uk ([10.161.14.10]) by BGB01XI1011.national.core.bbc.co.uk ([10.161.14.15]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 19:53:36 +0000
From: Lucas Pardue <Lucas.Pardue@bbc.co.uk>
To: "Fossati, Thomas (Nokia - GB/Cambridge)" <thomas.fossati@nokia.com>, Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>
CC: "ilariliusvaara@welho.com" <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Thread-Topic: Interest in a UDP equivalent to the CONNECT method
Thread-Index: AdOc9p/RJM+VVNUGQX2RQg/+Gk9/9QADwWgAADABY9AAA5QsgAABexaAAAJduwAAApFwAAAAyeBg
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 19:53:36 +0000
Message-ID: <7CF7F94CB496BF4FAB1676F375F9666A3BACAF40@bgb01xud1012>
References: <7CF7F94CB496BF4FAB1676F375F9666A3BACADD6@bgb01xud1012> <20180203154250.GA28930@LK-Perkele-VII> <7CF7F94CB496BF4FAB1676F375F9666A3BACAEC5@bgb01xud1012> <CAHbrMsCTV3OyMNhroSOGBWzH+NhSSDG2Qp4+TpkD2b=kTkV9sg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKcm_gNyqHWu0jEE_Ep+Z_6-FSj-6S6PYqhA3Y_Ma5-gKA7C4A@mail.gmail.com> <CAHbrMsApQQe_p8aNx5bgp0RXBJiG7kiH69MXncZOQ7hLH_sB9w@mail.gmail.com> <4E590E49-9303-4D4E-8D1C-A614876F0C5C@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E590E49-9303-4D4E-8D1C-A614876F0C5C@nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.19.161.212]
x-exclaimer-md-config: c91d45b2-6e10-4209-9543-d9970fac71b7
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-11.0.0.4255-8.200.1013-23642.002
x-tm-as-result: No--4.702100-0.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: Yes
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=0.289, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, W3C_NW=0.5
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1eiQMT-0000q0-8m 92036b71eef76cec4887c8a3191ed37e
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: Interest in a UDP equivalent to the CONNECT method
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/7CF7F94CB496BF4FAB1676F375F9666A3BACAF40@bgb01xud1012>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/35086
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi Thomas,

> It looks like it'd be possible for an end user to have one security association
> to the QUIC transport proxy and a separate one with the other QUIC end
> that gets tunnelled through the proxy.
> 
> Is my reading correct?
> 

Yes that is what I had pictured. This is sometimes referred to as a "secure web proxy". Some UAs can make use of this (on TCP) by means of a Proxy auto-config (PAC) file that uses the HTTPS proxy type [1].

Regards
Lucas

[1] https://www.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/secure-web-proxy