IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS=0 and PUSH_PROMISE

Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> Tue, 23 July 2013 22:39 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7CD11E8161 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.548
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.548 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YQJg8vLi8ENd for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88A611E8168 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:38:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1V1lE6-0006Sg-Md for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:38:38 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:38:38 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1V1lE6-0006Sg-Md@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <grmocg@gmail.com>) id 1V1lDx-0006Rm-3T for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:38:29 +0000
Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com ([209.85.214.175]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <grmocg@gmail.com>) id 1V1lDw-0003cI-Hz for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:38:29 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id xn12so302444obc.20 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=yDt7p0FUj3sM5kVTyA8bAOsDTslTvq5wyn/+Bi3iNN8=; b=GfdUiiOzPq6YGtQ/LYKZmGBwY6MQMAY0V3HumAJsNcw8zhS14RF45ocuCvL6QnD1+q RCVZzVXMtZqA/284AG0LHuB0e8r1GewxbHgxpPejRicPXDjfqi9k9vX7WoPFW5A6jE+E gTfMrdlIdfNozCMhMjbsplp9FOBgvWhEqterBFD65+P8OTsmrryBQYy2zXLfbWjg313Q k/srRKkNXi7cMPtrLzX5/ewXfAHZLvHvA6SK8i9Zn6sYXLn3SMDEJDqGW4lmeYbaf6v1 VByizPL/WgxwoDPfJsiMjVsJe5hnNO2brjOlmG4pfRHIUSOBqLwS13FYBjQ9D3j1D7ZA y2Tw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.27.74 with SMTP id r10mr27413077obg.63.1374619082648; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.91.229 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnV7ZZ_MWeuP2cDKombNWJJahES02XYTJh0OJY7yo17ytQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+KJw_5PcUxBiUnQ00=G2C4Q6MnaB=hpNDk+9eTeZMs3Lz-CpA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+FsNf7YBDfO_=fW7nPHXdUi0F+0+4S2AUm_T2gHtqYhER8MA@mail.gmail.com> <20130723190419.GA25817@LK-Perkele-VII> <CAP+FsNc5tef8WRCaH-_6z5se=vVPscSQ3+GfEF0T02q8oKq6WA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWx5d_3U+tFQYG68+NCGC3Q2Hfm_PD0hgALeawb+PY-ZA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP+FsNfauVPhGZH31_LFeQKOuPF0KcYKp7U4qMBtDUsv-Ja-cQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnV7ZZ_MWeuP2cDKombNWJJahES02XYTJh0OJY7yo17ytQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:38:02 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNfgEqP2dwHsG0RD2ZizpVNw=98mTJ=1Q33b3UK8NdhjYA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>, Gábor Molnár <gabor.molnar@sch.bme.hu>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e01184b2e1f745204e2357220"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.175; envelope-from=grmocg@gmail.com; helo=mail-ob0-f175.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.680, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1V1lDw-0003cI-Hz d052232e44eb23e4e01f176db143deac
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS=0 and PUSH_PROMISE
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAP+FsNfgEqP2dwHsG0RD2ZizpVNw=98mTJ=1Q33b3UK8NdhjYA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18897
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I'm a proxy guy, actually.
I have to deal with both sides constantly, except that I'm more memory,
CPU, and bandwidth constrained. It is true that I don't have to deal with
rendering, however.

-=R


On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 23 July 2013 15:21, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> We've done a lot to protect resources on a server, but I don't think
> >> that a client is able to limit the commitments it has to make in order
> >> to continue to use a connection.
> >
> > Given the above, do you still feel that way? :)
>
> You're a server guy.  That mostly just reads like a "it's clients, who
> cares, they can deal with it".  I'll hold my opinion until the client
> folks reply.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email