Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-02, example on 3. 451 Unavailable For Legal Reasons
Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org> Thu, 01 October 2015 20:27 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A89F81B2F1F for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 13:27:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XHNVwVYsc395 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 13:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B38A91B2F1D for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 13:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ZhkOj-0007id-Pr for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 20:24:13 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ZhkOj-0007id-Pr@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ylafon@w3.org>) id 1ZhkOh-0007hu-3I for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 20:24:11 +0000
Received: from raoul.w3.org ([128.30.52.128]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ylafon@w3.org>) id 1ZhkOf-0005k9-Oj for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 20:24:10 +0000
Received: from homard.platy.net ([80.67.176.7] helo=[192.168.1.37]) by raoul.w3.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ylafon@w3.org>) id 1ZhkOf-0008XN-AF for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 20:24:09 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.0 \(3094\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
From: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6iu2qKpYQ_mwMS8vUoXXM3j_R4PBPGR1thZr5v6Bn5ZKJA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 17:53:54 +0000
Cc: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Laura Kataja <Laura.Kataja@iki.fi>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 22:24:07 +0200
Message-Id: <E1Zhi3A-00037O-Gw@maggie.w3.org>
X-Name-Md5: efe3dad792d606410c9cc49cedaffc94
References: <560b5cda.4c11190a.c939.52dcSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> <CAHBU6iu2qKpYQ_mwMS8vUoXXM3j_R4PBPGR1thZr5v6Bn5ZKJA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3094)
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, AWL=-2.251, BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, W3C_NW=0.5
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1ZhkOf-0005k9-Oj c91848f182a4b4bdb1a6f95e81eaeb00
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-02, example on 3. 451 Unavailable For Legal Reasons
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/E1Zhi3A-00037O-Gw@maggie.w3.org>
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/30309
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> Yeah, good catch. If someone wants to propose a URL for the entity > blocking the People’s Front of Judea, I’ll wire that in. > Link: <http://example.com/murus-incendii.html>; rel=blocked-by (from Laura Kataja) / Kari Hurtta > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Kari Hurtta <khurtta@welho.com> wrote: > >> >> >> An HTTP Status Code to Report Legal Obstacles >> draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-02 >> August 31, 2015 >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-02 >> >> On >> >> 3. 451 Unavailable For Legal Reasons >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-02#section-3 >> >> there is an example. >> >> Next chapter >> >> 4. Identifying Blocking Entities >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-02#section-4 >> >> introduces "Link" HTTP header field for that. >> >> Should previous example also include that "Link" header field or is it >> too early? >> >> Otherwise the example do not fulfill that "SHOULD" -requirement. >> >> >> / Kari Hurtta >> ( not member of the mailing list) >> >> > > > -- > - Tim Bray (If you’d like to send me a private message, see > https://keybase.io/timbray)
- draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-02, … Kari Hurtta
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-… Kari Hurtta
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-… Ted Hardie
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-… Tim Bray
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-… Kari Hurtta