Re: signatures vs sf-date
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 23 January 2023 06:59 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D550AC14F726 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Jan 2023 22:59:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b="MLnJgJTO"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="WvhLq8KC"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YAjILlZhsZLt for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Jan 2023 22:59:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53047C14E511 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Jan 2023 22:59:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1pJqlC-003uDe-G6 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 06:56:54 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 06:56:54 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1pJqlC-003uDe-G6@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1pJqlA-003uCB-Ib for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 06:56:52 +0000
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.21]) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1pJql9-00Dyc4-44 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 06:56:52 +0000
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C7E3200406; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 01:56:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 23 Jan 2023 01:56:37 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1674456996; x= 1674543396; bh=XzluOAB93+DQ47JGMydm06LnhpV2eL88yjiWOE35+TQ=; b=M LnJgJTOUWURakcBSlrEqddVtvsGQXFpcPzt/cEVVRm9Gu1dzKMNo7FTljO4TOqJB LrGAiN3SQY2iDma+vNCm6IGeZjlI2C++WVRBNAaHq9mgP7tWnldp4V1L51nwJdwM o0XH2ozJfEJ9S5IUD7vOKUEAdUGf8AiAd5pSm6HuBw0ovyKu0rkNyx/uirJCHyKq tmNe+xdmQz8vkyk3SNmBxo4zXi+BX02A2YH0OFNjSPNAwZZdwdAw7P2WABKURaxy G09aqN2fWw3iEnh5RlS44b+GuWP5/ymgzRPirSo3nhlalkQSV77dj3mrSjsgBPU2 /BiHLfmNcMNojXFvNhTMA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1674456996; x= 1674543396; bh=XzluOAB93+DQ47JGMydm06LnhpV2eL88yjiWOE35+TQ=; b=W vhLq8KCZINIbolcGN0D5iUcvEFSjbMmiEB7w6V6W7rEOCqeMbH3/FRYpJLMg1I+d pdTkJOBc1SQ7V0SmpCmi3OLpHGuln9l/bMH4jVNZYCtKnEiG44s5qDjorpb5IWbR afo30TD+47CuXVWnOQzE3oh2/j0hnbK6r0Dk251wYDBaJi62xMcOJTPpyckiIdLc GacOn4736dz9axASotm+lZcom5bONfQCq4stJHFe11/W7ACvol32gJfL8eGWR3nM AJ+l5+QnUWuTqjqss0dJtFwkZPez/g3xZ97iA6xKOLloae9vJoSSBwpXHGK6J4Y7 sPgcM0rLM5udauDTyH2Hg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:pC_OY2YshrekB5sGiamd5uLN32IasSDfyL8N1KLItkuMZb0WQE_IEQ> <xme:pC_OY5anAlpOhvryn2AVsDHEACEXfabqrTpOXCDXzQimX9G9bOOt3OZVBXCJVoPoC jgUvDI5ev7-yKjL9g>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:pC_OYw93Wj_ycLJ8tASlpS7EHjuMqaE-9dPZ3oLgrGT86r09UmPWR5-C18M7iHWM4hML8lD2ZJyHrr9KmZVKLGSkV5ptpb6WLgbkyWxe4Nx6SCYvRe9-tmHP>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedruddujedguddtvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpegtggfuhfgjffevgffkfhfvofesthejmhdthhdtvdenucfhrhhomhepofgr rhhkucfpohhtthhinhhghhgrmhcuoehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpefgieevhfduteethedujedvjefggfefiefggeejgfdujefgudekuedugeej tdefteenucffohhmrghinhepmhhnohhtrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:pC_OY4qXM0lnxZHaS39X-oCNoCs44GobP8ucIB7Zqt02z0VinqdZUg> <xmx:pC_OYxpGmSBHWLcJutrpvVq4ndncdWri9p0TEGkaR52ATRzcly6Ufg> <xmx:pC_OY2TRHEPUEsu9vpGEL8yL9oroCORHli1podQouu5wQBDiAmh0XQ> <xmx:pC_OYwTHEwk01-E1FvQgSV0P8vbaB2fcTHaZzUZfqmwCSkIXQ48W-w>
Feedback-ID: ie6694242:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 23 Jan 2023 01:56:34 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.300.101.1.3\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <8b547e17-1f24-ff1f-90d1-ec4c974de88f@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 17:56:09 +1100
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <FEA9B22C-B3AC-48D0-B4AC-64BADB8E8F18@mnot.net>
References: <2070c8e0-98d6-7b63-77c3-550bcd661397@gmx.de> <8b547e17-1f24-ff1f-90d1-ec4c974de88f@gmx.de>
To: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.300.101.1.3)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.21; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=mnot@mnot.net domain=mnot.net), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=mnot@mnot.net domain=messagingengine.com), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1pJql9-00Dyc4-44 30be3991d4da0468b6e5eda7569f5108
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: signatures vs sf-date
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/FEA9B22C-B3AC-48D0-B4AC-64BADB8E8F18@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/40697
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> On 19 Dec 2022, at 9:28 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > > This sort of confirms that we really need to figure out what the > expectations for users of SF (be it implementations or specifications) > are - is support of sf-date an extension you need to opt in somehow? Yes - by emitting or consuming a field that uses it. -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
- signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Martin J. Dürst
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp
- support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signatures… Julian Reschke
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Julian Reschke
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Julian Reschke
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Julian Reschke
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Julian Reschke
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Julian Reschke
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Carsten Bormann
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Justin Richer
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Roy T. Fielding
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Roy T. Fielding
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Justin Richer
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Julian Reschke
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Mark Nottingham
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Julian Reschke
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Julian Reschke
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Mark Nottingham
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Julian Reschke
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Willy Tarreau
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Julian Reschke
- Re: support for non-ASCII in strings, was: signat… Julian Reschke
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Mark Nottingham
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Lucas Pardue
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Lucas Pardue
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Mark Nottingham
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Lucas Pardue
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Mark Nottingham
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Mark Nottingham
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Watson Ladd
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Watson Ladd
- Re: signatures vs sf-date Julian Reschke