IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Mon, 11 February 2013 15:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894E321F8880 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 07:26:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.571
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.571 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.028, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2EV9p9t-lI05 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 07:26:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA4B921F8844 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 07:25:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1U4vGF-00046Z-5K for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:25:39 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:25:39 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1U4vGF-00046Z-5K@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <lear@cisco.com>) id 1U4vG6-00044V-LJ for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:25:30 +0000
Received: from ams-iport-3.cisco.com ([144.254.224.146]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <lear@cisco.com>) id 1U4vG1-0004bz-Nz for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:25:30 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=452; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1360596325; x=1361805925; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iAbE018H/RRsp9RZuexmbhcDGQzghh5daIfwKBEHfdc=; b=juJE+C7VW1f5W3nqRsJTRAhK+HeIMLO8C09X4wfAXJ5uGJ5yf+BaMBSF Ut3rsJxIKLFPuKPq7uPFAlqvTSOzhw5x1a6i8XChoA5kr4fx27qWRJXaV pNTjOxgNQIOgcgK8GfDm/XjE0T5WSkET26oJ/ksUu9Jy5Yr1eQoibzRk7 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFALMMGVGQ/khL/2dsb2JhbABFhk66TBZzgh8BAQEEI1UBEAsOCgICBRYLAgIJAwIBAgFFBg0BBwEBiA6uGpF5gSOPV4ETA5YkkFODBw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,643,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="11726445"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by ams-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2013 15:24:58 +0000
Received: from dhcp-10-61-109-142.cisco.com (dhcp-10-61-109-142.cisco.com [10.61.109.142]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1BFOu0C031921 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:24:58 GMT
Message-ID: <51190D4E.8080208@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:25:02 +0100
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
References: <5110CB17.2000200@cisco.com> <CABaLYCuKuei2jOKpFtcQ8Y+7oPrhfibn3HN1rqGqRkUGt1H5Bg@mail.gmail.com> <020463E4-2F8E-4C04-9154-556D2B10FFB5@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <020463E4-2F8E-4C04-9154-556D2B10FFB5@mnot.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=144.254.224.146; envelope-from=lear@cisco.com; helo=ams-iport-3.cisco.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.617, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1U4vG1-0004bz-Nz c3832515df7c4eb5d10f61b99c91af02
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: moving forward on draft-lear-httpbis-svcinfo-rr
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/51190D4E.8080208@cisco.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/16556
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

[Note I'm on vacation and avoiding the computer]

On 2/11/13 6:17 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Eliot - a major portion of the conversation was about whether this would be in a new record type vs. in a TXT record. Do you plan to address that in your next draft? 
>

I think the conversation was about whether to a use a text formed record
rather than a binary encoded one.  Using TXT wouldn't be a good idea for
any number of reasons.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email