Re: Call for Adoption -- Cache-Control: immutable

"Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com> Fri, 09 December 2016 20:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F0F1129545 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 12:18:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gbiv.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ALni-EtsQ_2C for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 12:18:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D03731293E1 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 12:18:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1cFRaz-0006ry-Gt for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 20:16:41 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 20:16:41 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1cFRaz-0006ry-Gt@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <fielding@gbiv.com>) id 1cFRas-0006om-7t for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 20:16:34 +0000
Received: from sub5.mail.dreamhost.com ([208.113.200.129] helo=homiemail-a94.g.dreamhost.com) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.1:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <fielding@gbiv.com>) id 1cFRal-0007lb-Jr for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 20:16:28 +0000
Received: from homiemail-a94.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a94.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02AF18019D2C; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 12:16:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=gbiv.com; bh=8fB3kdfOZlpB87e8sk1hV7TOteE=; b=hWQOvokzLuAGRjCwc7m66w6l/k+Y HmvviKnfwWiZuDbq0rd8BwheSQ5cbRk0kE+jXqa8vaVc97DDhgjH7PgJ8w3gSIDj IYTTIYu+T4ejFGDsDwOazS/xpup18Xwn5SVEC+fInXtC0/2+WfI2mZu3H7Yg06MD ieOue5XGGQTYnbg=
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (ip68-228-71-159.oc.oc.cox.net [68.228.71.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: fielding@gbiv.com) by homiemail-a94.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E07568019D29; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 12:16:02 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
In-Reply-To: <95FCCB5F-A458-4BF8-A416-4B6FFD8B152B@mnot.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 12:16:02 -0800
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0408FC55-30A2-4917-8175-7D8A6595D7D1@gbiv.com>
References: <95FCCB5F-A458-4BF8-A416-4B6FFD8B152B@mnot.net>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Received-SPF: none client-ip=208.113.200.129; envelope-from=fielding@gbiv.com; helo=homiemail-a94.g.dreamhost.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=1.188, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1cFRal-0007lb-Jr 2d2ff5786213b561f5f65df3e2410985
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption -- Cache-Control: immutable
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/0408FC55-30A2-4917-8175-7D8A6595D7D1@gbiv.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33148
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> On Dec 7, 2016, at 8:03 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
> As discussed in Seoul, there seems to be strong interest in adopting Patrick's draft:
>  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mcmanus-immutable
> 
> Please indicate any concerns on-list; statements of support would also be helpful.

I support adoption of this draft.  I would prefer some technical and editorial changes,
but that discussion can wait.

....Roy