Re: #448, was: p2: Accept-Language missing, empty or no match

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 10 June 2013 07:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9074D21F8B35 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 00:11:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.266
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.266 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.333, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a1XQVibINg2C for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 00:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8171921F89C3 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 00:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UlwEJ-0003nG-Qm for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 07:09:28 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 07:09:27 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UlwEJ-0003nG-Qm@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1UlwE6-0003mB-IY for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 07:09:14 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1UlwE5-0001N7-9D for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 07:09:14 +0000
Received: from [131.113.150.228] (unknown [131.113.150.228]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2649422E253; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 03:08:50 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <51B574F3.9040504@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 16:08:47 +0900
Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A095D5D5-02A4-4484-BCD7-14F6FC3D09AC@mnot.net>
References: <8741FE69-C013-4853-A9A3-6321A18E56EA@mnot.net> <2896D8B9-399D-4F68-9BC1-9EFDB893C2BE@mnot.net> <sn5vn8pe3hins3oeghba9qrkcooustfmg8@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <21D17E62-229B-41E2-A7E5-9623A52DE3C2@mnot.net> <n2o0o8tt6miq9ljs4pr47l6p2s8hgi6hb4@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <60F8768B-E166-4002-B96E-55737C4CBBA1@mnot.net> <51B4B049.2050100@gmx.de> <C0094534-E0EF-418E-BE8B-0AD6ACE58EF7@mnot.net> <51B574F3.9040504@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.449, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UlwE5-0001N7-9D a78fc226e4bf881afcc66c4c85cb50f1
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: #448, was: p2: Accept-Language missing, empty or no match
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/A095D5D5-02A4-4484-BCD7-14F6FC3D09AC@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18210
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Again, WFM.

On 10/06/2013, at 3:40 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:

> On 2013-06-10 02:59, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> WFM, although I note that we're not being very consistent in how we use language. (shrug)
> 
> Indeed; in the other cases we say "MAY". So my preference would be to change all of them to "can" (preferred), or to make this one a MAY.
> 
> Best regards, Julian
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/