Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10: 2.3. The "http-opportunistic" well-known URI / cache-control

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Sun, 05 February 2017 00:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509EE1294FE for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 16:01:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DDWz3acHY_Ir for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 16:01:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54876129420 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 16:01:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1caAE1-00031M-QN for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2017 23:58:37 +0000
Resent-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 23:58:37 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1caAE1-00031M-QN@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1caADv-00030H-36 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2017 23:58:31 +0000
Received: from mail-qk0-f178.google.com ([209.85.220.178]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1caADL-0000Kf-8Y for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2017 23:58:25 +0000
Received: by mail-qk0-f178.google.com with SMTP id s186so24900287qkb.1 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Sat, 04 Feb 2017 15:57:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yltm2nFnXtgXdxXhAmvgI/BOfJdIVNlw01og/smkapk=; b=JPlh5C+R/gF4xbNBROId2KYuNSP55XPSqAS5sTZJV6hYxhMDUagYuAfbanQoPImEf+ zqrzVJvzBPHQKI7pbQoX+oy+UBiqIVJPXoBg+vj3kPHe78aJMTcdof5KnhtT6lmUgf/q mseY4UFvUsmp9zS/pHBdrpMxYkCv9W2CK71XzqSoHbYFq+OXl/GuyqCAJenh7v0pjzW8 iP8+qeH5pZP5n/QWMMZia7XvLWAg00rU7cBAMR8IlMCtm2qRbJEDUPH1nvhgqmiG0Ocn Ifb2YKeVRC062DBCZbXl620QfCMZzVoZGg2eAkij7nqctq3DOAJ6oKMFa8gYhuYSj5wi +flg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yltm2nFnXtgXdxXhAmvgI/BOfJdIVNlw01og/smkapk=; b=leMTR5BDSffBqmZcTpjTjMdsVXAqlGfMYZl7EeKF/oXHafeo8G6GbteFTyXK08XIyg o4UqYPlWDanI+7pqqDbPvd9lczQ/+pDso3dheC5P5CYJt6/HTNL+fJ7PQIZMWpVi+21M BoUdTyvuVOR+YITJAfKqa1XR8Gt6Hbx+DSwgXS4ra097A6w17nLYHvly3mDMfF57oeHH juL00SKuDGDRqfzVfibVxbyr9SdBv6xMQ2UMmCJ00wf+lDLd7CNFG6B796VpwB0LlEK5 SLmMXLRfF1yF5N4O7D2SNKhcOWdu8/42iFxU+tzywJsdmCKbdkSYWSXPzeFEj7W3+Wyx zyNw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lxHpxiAn4IdtDvJKyPSSE6nIAwDgc1NWktOmJiRniW9f8U5ArQTeptqc+Ce4+DsqwJgiFojdtNPvrwPw==
X-Received: by 10.55.25.94 with SMTP id k91mr3330700qkh.202.1486252649389; Sat, 04 Feb 2017 15:57:29 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.19.112 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 15:57:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20170204094624.D7A691D29E@welho-filter2.welho.com>
References: <CABkgnnVBCj3LGNM6UH51okP9TQrxEmJwnXbg62qq9ex3fH-Xog@mail.gmail.com> <20170204094624.D7A691D29E@welho-filter2.welho.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 10:57:28 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVSWuCK2=Jg1i5mamiFa3_9RYfU6QgFWhb5tDUyE0Ku2g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
Cc: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.220.178; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk0-f178.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, TIME_LIMIT_EXCEEDED=0
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1caADL-0000Kf-8Y 82903de300af271be259ab1b78c0fd2b
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-10: 2.3. The "http-opportunistic" well-known URI / cache-control
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnVSWuCK2=Jg1i5mamiFa3_9RYfU6QgFWhb5tDUyE0Ku2g@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/33443
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 4 February 2017 at 20:46, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org> wrote:
> In other words is client allowed use http-opportunistic response
> from another alternative service for that purpose, when response
> was cache-control = no-store ?

I'd say no.  The same goes for no-cache I think.

> I think that it is not possible to use response from another
> alternative service on that case and therefore cache-control = no-store
> implies that client must retrieve /.well-known/http-opportunistic
> from chosen alternative service.

That sounds right.