Permissible states for extension frames #591
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 11 August 2014 22:07 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E35691A0174 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 15:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.67
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.67 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MNhApVhKtXhu for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 15:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBAE31A0101 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 15:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XGxhT-0005K2-1p for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 22:04:19 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 22:04:19 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XGxhT-0005K2-1p@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1XGxh1-0005JF-QY for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 22:03:51 +0000
Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1XGxh1-0004js-4e for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 22:03:51 +0000
Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id f8so4961483wiw.12 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 15:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=J/FJP+1ytiSed2q6DjLA9Oomjok4I0P6wjcnHPlpRU0=; b=JnQmkc0SiSr/jSGdR6LiT+577wL3Vzsr4p6zQKlGEDOxN1YtwQawZyh7L8L1Ce/GTd ygpyxKYgiNPqNJcGIUSCgR+gkIvQ9OZ+D5jHDLQRUGVrFmuWM8klvVy/n/tByrxOJ6KH s/9fnaoNxhHvnsdDQUdy+mcLabKM5n1mqzKyfCTDN+bjhRWHfWy8F8Meu+vlRTA8+5JN sVZwE2IpmH8ZD6CJB7UKzQGSEcRmxfdIFnYQSHUqJdC9SG78L6JVVkwhI6V1J/8CdwFV 2bc73q9XyAC5B5OiDk9jHnFvsM+TSPgrdYRFf3zXrdZI8BtH5TntEX+RNFuXupAL+eCT ex9g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.63.37 with SMTP id d5mr595988wjs.92.1407794604735; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 15:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.6.229 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Aug 2014 15:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 15:03:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVgnJSmJW2B4nJ8Vb-Nwi3EF2pra7D_m8uqZfQ8H1a2eA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.212.173; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-wi0-f173.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.733, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1XGxh1-0004js-4e f01e43c7c233af7ef1a887f70aeb95da
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Permissible states for extension frames #591
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnVgnJSmJW2B4nJ8Vb-Nwi3EF2pra7D_m8uqZfQ8H1a2eA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/26586
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
We don't really say this, but the implication is that an extension frame can appear anywhere, for any stream. Worst case, you can have frames appearing with any stream number at any time. Are we OK with this? Or... do we want to limit the sending of extension frames on streams somehow. Note that the most permissibly constrained frame type is PRIORITY, which can appear in any state other than "idle". A similar constraint would be relatively easy to enact. A tighter scope, like just "open" and the sending-permitted "half-closed" variant, would be even easier to enact, but might reduce the utility of extension frames. -- https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/591
- Permissible states for extension frames #591 Martin Thomson
- Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 Greg Wilkins
- Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 Martin Thomson
- Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 Greg Wilkins
- Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 Amos Jeffries
- Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 Greg Wilkins
- RE: Permissible states for extension frames #591 Mike Bishop
- Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 Greg Wilkins
- Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 Martin Thomson
- Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 Greg Wilkins
- Re: Permissible states for extension frames #591 Mark Nottingham