IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: dont-revalidate Cache-Control header

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 16 July 2015 09:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F3A1A874E for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 02:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F3EszEM6XYMb for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 02:29:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 754D91A874C for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 02:29:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ZFfRg-0003us-Ui for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:27:12 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:27:12 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ZFfRg-0003us-Ui@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1ZFfRe-0003u2-Ak for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:27:10 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1ZFfRa-0007j8-0o for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:27:09 +0000
Received: from [37.9.98.236] (unknown [89.246.67.118]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DAFFB22E200; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 05:26:42 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <CABgOVa+C48yYp-ZkawY+Ho6pXONa_UfB0MVt_2+d0ejyESu2Pw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:26:42 +0200
Cc: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <54973543-2406-4188-8DCD-AE3C85ACB76A@mnot.net>
References: <CABgOVaLHBb4zcgvO4NUUmAzUjNkocBGYY3atFA9iuYyoLaLQsA@mail.gmail.com> <559F9E90.4020801@treenet.co.nz> <CABgOVaLG6QZyjqk2AGYupShST_u3ty9BpxUcPX+_yMEC1hyHAQ@mail.gmail.com> <961203FE-7E54-410F-923E-71C04914CD2E@mnot.net> <CABgOVaJxntEyT0v4GvWm0Qi9jbUPEnzxJgg4KyQSM1T_gN1mjQ@mail.gmail.com> <16407353-5C34-42E8-81A6-E0027EC3A0D0@mnot.net> <CABgOVa+C48yYp-ZkawY+Ho6pXONa_UfB0MVt_2+d0ejyESu2Pw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ben Maurer <ben.maurer@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.0
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.383, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_DB=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_IRR=-3, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1ZFfRa-0007j8-0o 227f61c4c5aa0d11f44cc19a7a5960d3
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: dont-revalidate Cache-Control header
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/54973543-2406-4188-8DCD-AE3C85ACB76A@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29968
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> On 14 Jul 2015, at 2:36 pm, Ben Maurer <ben.maurer@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Static is a fairly reasonable name. Static does imply that the resource will *never* be revalidated (ever) vs the dont-reload which implies no revalidations prior to expiration. I don't have any preferences between the two but wanted to call that out.
> 
> What's the next step here? 

Writing a small spec. Is there anyone who has experience doing this that's interested in helping out here? E.g., Ilya?

Cheers,

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email