IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: http2-encoded-data

Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> Fri, 10 July 2015 02:25 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70B61A8702 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 19:25:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.289
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.289 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5l7uNsnlfAvS for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 19:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1EFA1A86FE for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 19:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ZDNwL-0003gz-JR for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 02:21:25 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 02:21:25 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ZDNwL-0003gz-JR@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <phluid61@gmail.com>) id 1ZDNwH-0003gI-S6 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 02:21:21 +0000
Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com ([209.85.214.175]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <phluid61@gmail.com>) id 1ZDNwE-0007DF-Mu for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 02:21:21 +0000
Received: by obbop1 with SMTP id op1so183268942obb.2 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 19:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Ckbzknl0WnNnm7BRgM7i2NNDmY0YAJWrpZvOsCiPqaI=; b=Lw1ZnZEHC6eZ3TA8xjVWpALmcbK0vrELhdMXwaQZhVMfsubuypHpDUCSYLEa3IlLQ+ NxC95RZtSIunw8bxkwQmx4ZPQYDZjc2zqyvnHJUHUxwhusTtk1a4B970kTahLm79doLX KN8kqSVkUHkR0i1Wdxxb/4kGg31mJWMEmdy1RFxlM2ZGiBpmNJY+xgeXAwZdbgf9dYd8 cGqmGsqBqZv2Qy3CNplt9rpYm0wYfvhBfFosw4maMXhjARcZ42/YS3cJmuDKq8MOJfE4 XXlB4NI0UQcvqCJwhXQtwffoLT9wocnkCypB5KpldhmeG1mIwzJuPyv7uml0XcwHDxTj M9Tg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.239.138 with SMTP id n132mr15161536oih.99.1436494852427; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 19:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: phluid61@gmail.com
Received: by 10.202.226.205 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 19:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <DB4EA44B-C431-44C5-BF79-C5CA1DC6F986@greenbytes.de>
References: <37CB606B-D349-40B4-9905-AD8939F03D79@greenbytes.de> <CACweHNBLPgdS-UmUPZi9dwRdaA-22KkERvcM8oKxspftUuJAyQ@mail.gmail.com> <DB4EA44B-C431-44C5-BF79-C5CA1DC6F986@greenbytes.de>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:20:52 +1000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: uJQxWvaH5S_5-YiqlmZx1z9jud0
Message-ID: <CACweHNBxWXYDR_u-BMk+MjwL-7gvNf8Vpdx4+mrEQqA50xZWGQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
To: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0912546695ad051a7c05fe"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.175; envelope-from=phluid61@gmail.com; helo=mail-ob0-f175.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.779, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1ZDNwE-0007DF-Mu c28a0133ba7409f9c3340d3476d684ea
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: http2-encoded-data
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CACweHNBxWXYDR_u-BMk+MjwL-7gvNf8Vpdx4+mrEQqA50xZWGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/29913
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 7 July 2015 at 00:52, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
wrote:

>
> > Am 06.07.2015 um 14:23 schrieb Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>:
> >
> > Yep, that's perfectly (and intentionally) acceptable. If it's not clear
> enough, I could add some words.
> >
>
> I think this could be worth mentioning explicitly, just to avoid
> misunderstandings/interop problems.
>
>
>
​In my editor's copy [1] I now have the following:
"Any compression or decompression context for a GZIPPED_DATA frame is
unique to that frame. An endpoint MAY interleave DATA and GZIPPED_DATA
frames on a single stream."

Will that be enough to remove any potential confusion, do you think?

Cheers


[1] http://phluid61.github.io/internet-drafts/http2-encoded-data/​

-- 
  Matthew Kerwin
  http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email