IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Push and Caching

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 26 August 2014 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59441A0367 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.67
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.67 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oEHSPF9x5KzI for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DCCF1A889F for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1XMO6a-0006zG-1e for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 21:16:40 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 21:16:40 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1XMO6a-0006zG-1e@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1XMO6K-0006xt-M4 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 21:16:24 +0000
Received: from mail-lb0-f180.google.com ([209.85.217.180]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <martin.thomson@gmail.com>) id 1XMO6J-0002ih-Ln for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 21:16:24 +0000
Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id 10so2050433lbg.25 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=3a3hbntTjTfIz+n00LFx+R3PvGaXCswA/kLy1GXJ5j8=; b=kd1eMYApacPZxHaXeL+I/0sPNSTJNkOw7kg9puS5Zb2b2ZwRW8DlC7rAEGHOn0quak w8w7Q9m1+xRTG1XfvsYDL5cAEB6TeQImoHMzmwnVx07hc/cEMb5kCqF58hir+aoaEHPe kU5Qy5Wj7A4De657YkkUVWA02V4kaofOqg3mZsL89B0tcNeqIXkHfyShdbBtGoUKczFm jpuYmsEHtNxqBQS+GDvLNKwA+iD6nkMFapmNguXOIghJZegB+HX6y8PJz0swK6vseFJv bUXmo1rZu1L+zV/zSCFhHeWrlB5+n9F1phbDizPNiIaT9DRQq8HQTO6CIcDNDe1OKZCw VPCw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.87.81 with SMTP id v17mr19787649laz.17.1409087756872; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.166.75 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <02fc4b73d8004853b4286d02acbcc942@DM2PR05MB670.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <dc3d860ecb4b4d408a5ed0519a036e61@BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CABkgnnWvKgyDcm-1jEKZUA2Qza9M46X+X_QybwuqRwvSUrTjNw@mail.gmail.com> <B6B89855-237F-44DA-B29C-2A3BB5CE0EED@mnot.net> <920b92b90a3c47ef8d450c903b83af40@DM2PR05MB670.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <d94a3acceb954583a61b0118381df417@BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAOdDvNpa5WR4LJbsgQaBE3bTSAc+gXfYqCmV+zmUzE5b7+1a9A@mail.gmail.com> <CECA0C1A-E64C-443A-87AF-22BC66286F72@mnot.net> <CABkgnnXVJA3R4qhc__k4j+_LzeS7B24VxfCZwBSfywepEx=tKA@mail.gmail.com> <40d03e3bb1df480e808e64fa29048880@BL2PR03MB132.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CABkgnnX-0X+JZfFYhm18b=bLidaq_pqN5s-K0NBS28m-s6+9Kg@mail.gmail.com> <233C8C21-BF80-4E07-9717-56630085E192@mnot.net> <CABkgnnW9Uq5R1KvuTXuT=xUdX_pVWikyAOMp=ixJe+c0NRs4Lg@mail.gmail.com> <CAH_y2NHV_966DSX4yX-=tfDPUkk-obCXFbJnPifQpFb1KFjYDg@mail.gmail.com> <7d2fdc975fec4646b21e86620a834e72@DM2PR05MB670.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <2C38B85E-7290-4AE3-A886-12A329DE449C@mnot.net> <D92F296B-3E9A-42B3-978C-AC319C072C60@mnot.net> <9C64D35C-49BF-47F7-8D72-EFA2DA546FEA@gbiv.com> <22238EC5-50F4-4611-9FED-39E3D7B67B10@gbiv.com> <CABkgnnWssBqVw+aSb_8y80JBRWkQ8H+MPvmYZ7MyzOkYUQwWTQ@mail.gmail.com> <DE38D1FB-C9E1-441F-BDCE-9258714E0D96@gbiv.com> <02fc4b73d8004853b4286d02acbcc942@DM2PR05MB670.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:15:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWXiivor8cTrHiAsL8uyJ-42FsiF44_103c7M+w2e797A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: William Chow <wchow@mobolize.com>
Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.217.180; envelope-from=martin.thomson@gmail.com; helo=mail-lb0-f180.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.730, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1XMO6J-0002ih-Ln d5b765730076f480a8c36fe5ec320da7
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Push and Caching
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABkgnnWXiivor8cTrHiAsL8uyJ-42FsiF44_103c7M+w2e797A@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/26749
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 26 August 2014 13:19, William Chow <wchow@mobolize.com> wrote:
> With HTTP2 and server push, there can be multiple responses that directly correspond to that "original request" (this is the term used in the HTTP2 draft).

That's not right.  Server push always provides a request.  The only
difference is that it is synthesized by the server.

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status