Re: HTTPS 2.0 without TLS extension?

David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com> Tue, 23 July 2013 14:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC48311E8125 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 07:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ceBooBqbR8Ba for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 07:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E133411E8230 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 07:28:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1V1dXh-00070C-VL for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:26:22 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:26:21 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1V1dXh-00070C-VL@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <dwm@xpasc.com>) id 1V1dXV-0006zF-Us for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:26:09 +0000
Received: from c2w3p-2.abacamail.com ([209.133.53.32]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <dwm@xpasc.com>) id 1V1dXU-0003V8-Qz for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:26:09 +0000
Received: from xpasc.com (h-68-164-244-188.snva.ca.megapath.net [68.164.244.188]) by c2w3p-2.abacamail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C484063B for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:25:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from egate.xpasc.com (egate.xpasc.com [10.1.2.49]) by xpasc.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r6NEPexQ007715 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 07:25:41 -0700
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 07:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
Reply-To: "'HTTP Working Group'" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
cc: "'HTTP Working Group'" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In-Reply-To: <51EDF5F0.2050002@treenet.co.nz>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.01.1307230721500.1946@egate.xpasc.com>
References: <CACuKZqEBAqXs-cQF1U-g3npaXGR0LEoXZYxDv-3a+ftn-YG=_g@mail.gmail.com> <CABaLYCtT33y3Gbh5rduHNL8hFsamz34epciG+36pYbkMdwpujQ@mail.gmail.com> <51EDF5F0.2050002@treenet.co.nz>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Milter-Version: master.87-g7939dec
X-AV-Type: clean
X-AV-Accuracy: exact
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.133.53.32; envelope-from=dwm@xpasc.com; helo=c2w3p-2.abacamail.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.883, MISSING_HEADERS=1.207, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1V1dXU-0003V8-Qz 96a5ec4201dbdfb4c4fc448aefc6f7c2
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: HTTPS 2.0 without TLS extension?
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/alpine.LRH.2.01.1307230721500.1946@egate.xpasc.com>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18873
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Tue, 23 Jul 2013, Amos Jeffries wrote:

> Sigh. Missed the news yesterday? come relatively large number of corporates
> are still using Java installations installed since 1994.

While I agree with your concern, Java was released in 1995 so it is
unlikely there are many, if any, Java installations from 1994.