FRAME_SIZE_ERROR in RFC 9113
Kazu Yamamoto <kazu@iij.ad.jp> Mon, 27 June 2022 12:14 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 189F6C14CF13 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 05:14:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.761
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.761 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iij.ad.jp
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GMX46jvMEuIe for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 05:14:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95E3FC14CF1E for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 05:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1o5na2-005tDn-Fr for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 12:11:02 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 12:11:02 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1o5na2-005tDn-Fr@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from www-data by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <kazu@iij.ad.jp>) id 1o5na0-005tCc-Oo for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 12:11:00 +0000
Received: from mimas.w3.org ([128.30.52.79]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <kazu@iij.ad.jp>) id 1o5gyB-004qNI-N7 for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 05:07:31 +0000
Received: from mo1410.iij.ad.jp ([202.214.79.34] helo=omgo.iij.ad.jp) by mimas.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <kazu@iij.ad.jp>) id 1o5gy9-005doN-MM for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 05:07:30 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1;a=rsa-sha256;c=relaxed/simple;d=iij.ad.jp;h=Date: Message-Id:To:Subject:From:Mime-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding;i=kazu@iij.ad.jp;s=omgo2;t=1656306434;x=1657516034; bh=202gh4VkgO6C2xO7Zo+6aZ+i+EcSJWUrLb/ReWmD3dk=;b=wS74/8nL5p3MfkV5osgh9yY4DMz 4K+XcPxVS6KDIuj0T4e9qHz/nC9Qei3FTFA6+J76QH7lAvZ6Axsl7RB7RmAtdh8eDB4CUf8qDbZYg 2IRsc1bnGV/AMzU8t4R2vQ2Z/GGs6Muk77E/hRr39s9QmBy+lN1kkJ50wYEeOKQ+Poi0X3gHaWG/e 3AUL5tsywSGuspwgBzzF/aw1Px401O7CMJrZDpuOAAfBl3GE5Fav9zxSYKcCxfMrU9lzApqCnAE6T +z9OvaD4QMXiYp9TdeGqPd2BDKfzKXigrURJwXM4TBcrEzTR9RrZCFhkU2Ry5DuEQx60SZQkRs3Re Mhod5+w==;
Received: by omgo.iij.ad.jp (of-mo1410) id 25R57EDt010188; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:07:14 +0900
X-ENVID: IIJ
X-Iguazu-Qid: C8Ibh1yittGhhvCZ3g
X-Iguazu-QSIG: v=2; s=0; t=1656306434; q=B4WBTNCGHZ9W20mS3M; m=Yv9X4RS4Gs5IQPbhtdpPpK6TtPtgpZ/gj+IqtUEwGE8=
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:07:12 +0900
Message-Id: <20220627.140712.2068556426929617634.kazu@iij.ad.jp>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
From: Kazu Yamamoto <kazu@iij.ad.jp>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 27.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=202.214.79.34; envelope-from=kazu@iij.ad.jp; helo=omgo.iij.ad.jp
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=kazu@iij.ad.jp domain=iij.ad.jp), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-DKIM-Status: validation passed: (address=kazu@iij.ad.jp domain=kazu@iij.ad.jp), signature is good
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_IRA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: mimas.w3.org 1o5gy9-005doN-MM 1628836da9800b525f2b22d48b672347
X-caa-id: 373b8e8afd
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: FRAME_SIZE_ERROR in RFC 9113
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/20220627.140712.2068556426929617634.kazu@iij.ad.jp>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/40208
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Hello, Most FRAME_SIZE_ERRORs are sent as connection errors. But only for the PRIORITY frame, it is sent as a *stream* error. Why is the PRIORITY frame an exception? --Kazu
- FRAME_SIZE_ERROR in RFC 9113 Kazu Yamamoto
- Re: FRAME_SIZE_ERROR in RFC 9113 Willy Tarreau
- Re: FRAME_SIZE_ERROR in RFC 9113 Kazu Yamamoto