Re: Straw Poll: Restore Header Table and Static Table Indices

[Willy Tarreau <[e-mail]>]

Hi Poul-Henning,

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 07:48:50PM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> +1
> 
> I like this, it's nice and orthogonal.

Thank you.

> >-   Indices between 1 and the length of the static table (inclusive)
> >-   refer to elements in the static table (see Section 2.3.1).
> >-
> >+   Both the static and the dynamic tables are indexed starting at 1.
> >    Indices strictly greater than the length of the static table refer to
> >    elements in the dynamic table (see Section 2.3.2).  The length of the
> >    static table is subtracted to find the index into the dynamic table.
> 
> These three lines left in conflict somewhat with the four lines you
> add below.

Ah yes indeed, good catch. I tried to be careful and the spec is already
quite clean but I missed these ones.

> >-   Indices strictly greater than the sum of the lengths of both tables
> >-   MUST be treated as a decoding error.
> >+   Static table indices strictly greater than the length of the table as
> >+   defined in Appendix A MUST be treated as a decoding error. Dynamic table
> >+   indices strictly greater than the length of the dynamic table MUST be
> >+   treated as a decoding error.

Best regards,
Willy