Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt

Kari hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org> Tue, 04 October 2016 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A141293E1 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 09:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.917
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S2ddWqRztyUV for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 09:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 531B8127ABE for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 09:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1brSCN-0004oD-Nn for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 16:04:07 +0000
Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 16:04:07 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1brSCN-0004oD-Nn@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <khurtta@welho.com>) id 1brSCI-0004m5-CE for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 16:04:02 +0000
Received: from welho-filter1.welho.com ([83.102.41.23]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <khurtta@welho.com>) id 1brSC5-00052S-MF for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 16:04:00 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by welho-filter1.welho.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB4C111E5; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 19:03:21 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at pp.htv.fi
Received: from welho-smtp1.welho.com ([IPv6:::ffff:83.102.41.84]) by localhost (welho-filter1.welho.com [::ffff:83.102.41.23]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32VDY8O-jDRq; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 19:03:21 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from hurtta09lk.keh.iki.fi (89-27-35-245.bb.dnainternet.fi [89.27.35.245]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by welho-smtp1.welho.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4360286; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 19:03:20 +0300 (EEST)
To: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 19:03:20 +0300 (EEST)
Sender: hurtta@hurtta09lk.keh.iki.fi
From: Kari hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
CC: Kari hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
X-Mailer: ELM [version ME+ 2.5 PLalpha42]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-Id: <20161004160321.DFB4C111E5@welho-filter1.welho.com>
Received-SPF: none client-ip=83.102.41.23; envelope-from=khurtta@welho.com; helo=welho-filter1.welho.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-0.180, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.64, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1brSC5-00052S-MF a76f98cf0a5988ebde6d614fac310b8f
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/20161004160321.DFB4C111E5@welho-filter1.welho.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/32465
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07

2.  Using HTTP URIs over TLS
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07#section-2

|    An origin server that supports the resolution of "http" URIs can
|    indicate support for this specification by providing an alternative
|    service advertisement [RFC7838] for a protocol identifier that uses
|    TLS, such as "h2" [RFC7540].

This allows also other than "h2" (for example "http/1.1", which
is HTTP/1.1 over TLS).

2.1.  Alternative Server Opt-In
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07#section-2.1

|    Clients MUST NOT send "http" requests over a connection with the "h2"
|    protocol identifier, unless they have obtained a valid http-
|    opportunistic response for an origin (as per Section 2.3), and:

But this part is specific to "h2".


What part of this specification is valid when prococol
identifier is not "h2" ?

/ Kari Hurtta