I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-09.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Wed, 25 May 2022 12:33 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB215C18D825 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2022 05:33:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.651
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.651 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xYXumeU16Z6V for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 May 2022 05:33:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyra.w3.org (lyra.w3.org [128.30.52.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AA36C18D821 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 25 May 2022 05:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by lyra.w3.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1ntqAl-0005wQ-HC for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 25 May 2022 12:31:31 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 12:31:31 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1ntqAl-0005wQ-HC@lyra.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([128.30.52.76]) by lyra.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <internet-drafts@ietf.org>) id 1ntqAk-0005vV-5Y for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 25 May 2022 12:31:30 +0000
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <internet-drafts@ietf.org>) id 1ntqAi-0002hM-Ie for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 25 May 2022 12:31:30 +0000
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28ABDC18D81D; Wed, 25 May 2022 05:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 8.3.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Reply-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <165348187715.928.9672128181510213056@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 05:31:17 -0700
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=50.223.129.194; envelope-from=internet-drafts@ietf.org; helo=mail.ietf.org
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, W3C_NW=1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1ntqAi-0002hM-Ie db03613dbb079cefa12642567e598896
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-09.txt
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/165348187715.928.9672128181510213056@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/40042
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the HTTP WG of the IETF. Title : Digest Fields Authors : Roberto Polli Lucas Pardue Filename : draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-09.txt Pages : 36 Date : 2022-05-25 Abstract: This document defines HTTP fields that support integrity digests. The Content-Digest field can be used for the integrity of HTTP message content. The Repr-Digest field can be used for the integrity of HTTP representations. Want-Content-Digest and Want-Repr-Digest can be used to indicate a sender's interest and preferences for receiving the respective Integrity fields. This document obsoletes RFC 3230 and the Digest and Want-Digest HTTP fields. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers/ There is also an HTML version available at: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-09.html A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-09 Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-09.… internet-drafts